Obelisks, Incense, and the Morning Star: Unveiling the Secret God
- Michelle Hayman
- Aug 6
- 20 min read

Osiris, Baphomet, and the Vatican’s Hidden Idol
Recently, I explored the connection between the soul of Osiris; the Egyptian dying and rising god; and the ram/goat, a sacred animal that later emerged in occult tradition as Baphomet, the horned and androgynous figure embraced by secret orders like the Knights Templar and the O.T.O. I also examined the star of Ishtar, known in Egyptian and later Greco-Roman syncretism as Isis, the eternal consort of Osiris. This eight-pointed star; an ancient symbol of feminine power and fertility; appears not only on the Gates of Babylon but also, quite conspicuously, on the Gate of Porto del Popolo in Rome. This very gate once welcomed pilgrims entering the city that the apostle Peter himself cryptically referred to as "Babylon"; what some now call Babylon 2.0.
But today, I want to go deeper.
If Osiris is not simply a mythological figure but, as I will show, a veiled representation of the devil himself; then the question becomes unavoidable: Why does the Roman Catholic Church enshrine his phallic pillar; the very penis of Osiris; in what is supposed to be St. Peter’s Square? Why reinforce a phallic idol with symbols of solar royalty in 1586 if paganism already been “conquered”?
Why do believers gather in reverence around a symbol of death, resurrection, and regeneration that belongs not to Christ, but to the ancient adversary in disguise?
In this investigation, we’ll uncover the deeper meanings behind the pine cone, and the disturbing symbolic alignments between the Church’s rituals and the resurrection cults of Osiris, Baphomet, and Saturn.
One of the most striking examples comes from the Exsultet, the Catholic Easter Vigil chant. In Latin, it contains the lines:
“Flammas eius lúcifer matutínus invéniat: ille, inquam, lúcifer, qui nescit occásum. Christus Fílius tuus…” – which they translate to: “May this flame be found still burning by the Morning Star: the one Morning Star who never sets, Christ your Son, who, coming back from death’s domain, has shed his peaceful light on humanity…”.
Yes — the Catholic liturgy openly uses the name “Lucifer” in reference to Christ, singing lines like “Lucifer qui nescit occasum… Christus Filius tuus” ; which literally means, “That Lucifer who never sets… Christ, your Son.” This isn’t rumor or mistranslation — it’s in the official Latin Easter Vigil. The Church insists that Lucifer here merely means “morning star,” citing Revelation 22:16 where Christ calls Himself the bright and morning star.
But this is exactly the problem.
Because in Isaiah 14:12; also in the Latin Bible; Lucifer is the name for the fallen one, the one cast down from heaven. And in the common understanding of the word for centuries, Lucifer = Satan. So when the Church places that name in the mouth of a deacon during a solemn liturgy and then equates it directly with Christ, it creates a ritual contradiction of staggering proportions: Jesus is called by the name of the Devil.
Apologists brush this off as harmless Latin tradition. But critics and ex-occultists warn that words in ritual are never neutral. They carry symbolic weight and spiritual intent. In the occult world, double-speak is not a mistake; it’s the method. Say one thing to the uninitiated, mean something very different to those with eyes to see.
So when the Church invokes “Lucifer” in a sacred rite and identifies him as Christ, many believe it’s not theology; it’s ritual inversion. A hidden glorification of the light-bringer; not the Son of God, but the false light.
The Church tries to explain away its use of the word Lucifer by appealing to “historical innocence.” They point out that a few early Christians supposedly bore the name; like St. Lucifer of Cagliari in the 4th century; as if that somehow sanitizes the term. They also cite inscriptions like “lucifer qui lucet in caelis” (“Lucifer who shines in the heavens”) found on tombs, claiming it was meant to represent a poetic metaphor for light. But how many “accidents” does it take before it stops being accidental?
In the Vatican Necropolis; a pagan burial ground beneath the very heart of Roman Catholicism; there is even a chamber labeled “Tomb of Lucifer.” The official story? Oh, it’s just a family name. Just another coincidence. Just an old Latin word that used to mean “light-bringer.” But if Lucifer is now clearly recognized as the name of the adversary; the fallen one; then why has the Church clung so tightly to it? Why is the name carved into stone beneath their holy altar?
They say “the meaning changed over time.” But what if the meaning never changed; and what’s changed is the mask?
The truth is: there’s nothing innocent about calling Christ by the Devil’s name, or enshrining that name in the foundations of the so-called Holy See. The deeper you dig, the clearer it becomes.

Pope Gregory XIII proudly bore the winged dragon as his heraldic emblem; a creature long associated with power, secrecy, and the ancient adversary. Under his papacy, this symbol wasn’t hidden but exalted. Soon after, the eight-pointed star of Ishtar; the ancient sign of the goddess of Babylon; would crown Rome’s northern gate.
Luciferian Symbols in Church Art and Architecture
Beyond words, skeptics point to symbols and imagery in Catholic churches that eerily resemble those in occult or pagan systems. They argue that certain elements of church design, art, and ritual paraphernalia were never part of original Christianity but were later “borrowed” (or infiltrated) from mystery religions and Freemasonry – the very traditions that venerate Lucifer as the hidden light.
You’ll find the All-Seeing Eye watching from stained glass windows and cathedral domes — a glowing triangle with a single eye at its center. The Church claims it represents the Trinity or God’s omniscience. But this is a lie wrapped in tradition. That eye is not the eye of the Father; it is the Eye of Horus, the eye of the resurrected Osiris, torn from Egyptian mystery religion and planted into Christian worship like a parasite.

This is the same eye that appears on the back of the U.S. dollar bill, hovering above the unfinished pyramid — the emblem of Freemasonry, a secret order whose highest initiates openly revere Lucifer as the light-bearer. The architects of that symbol were not just expressing patriotism; they were encoding allegiance. The eye on the dollar is the eye of the Hidden God, the watcher of the initiated, the one who sees all but answers to no one.
The symbol itself traces back to Horus, the falcon-headed son of Osiris ; the god reborn after dismemberment and ritual resurrection.
Even the Roman poet Virgil, in his Fourth Eclogue, spoke of a coming child — a divine son who would bring in a new golden age. His lines were later twisted by early theologians as a prophecy of Christ, but esotericists knew better. They believed Virgil’s “child” was none other than Horus, the son of Isis and Osiris, returned to rule the world. That poem; long before Christ; became fuel for a false gospel, one that merged Christ with the child of the old gods, a perfect setup for spiritual inversion.
So when you see the All-Seeing Eye glowing above the altar or carved into sacred stone, understand what you’re looking at. This is not the eye of Yahweh. It is the eye of Osiris resurrected, the watchful gaze of Horus, the same eye worshipped by Freemasons, and the same eye that stares from the back of your currency. It is the symbol of the Beast cloaked in holiness, the mark of a false god who never left — just changed temples.

Tucked away within the courtyards of Rome stands something few visitors question; a towering bronze pinecone known as the Pigna, proudly displayed on holy ground. It is, in fact, the largest pinecone sculpture in the world, and its presence is no ornament. In ancient paganism, the pinecone was never just botanical. It symbolized fertility, spiritual regeneration, and most notably, enlightenment; the kind granted not by divine revelation, but by inner illumination and occult initiation.
In modern esoteric schools, the pinecone is understood as a symbol of the pineal gland; the so-called “third eye”, believed to be the seat of psychic insight, spiritual vision, and awakening. The connection is not a stretch; anatomically, the pineal gland even resembles a pinecone. Occult traditions teach that the awakening of this gland is what grants access to hidden knowledge; a central goal in mystery religions and Luciferian paths alike.
This brings us directly back to the Garden of Eden, where the serpent promised something eerily similar. In Genesis 3:5, the serpent says to Eve, “For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” This was not about physical sight — it was about the inner eye, the forbidden illumination that God had withheld. The serpent wasn’t offering death — not overtly. He was offering awakening. The promise was simple: your eyes will be opened, you will perceive what is hidden. It is no coincidence that the pinecone has become the symbol of that exact promise.
And who is the serpent in disguise, if not Osiris, the lord of death, the god of resurrection, and the one whose dismembered body; like the hidden parts of Eden’s knowledge; was scattered and ritually reassembled in mystery rites? The serpent’s lie in Eden was the blueprint of occultism: illumination through disobedience, transcendence through forbidden knowledge, divinity through internal power. The pinecone is its enduring symbol.

The fact that the Catholic Church not only tolerates this symbol but elevates it; placing it at the heart of its sacred grounds, even atop papal staffs — is not just suspicious. It is damning. While the Church may claim that such motifs now symbolize “new life in Christ” or spiritual immortality, the origins cannot be scrubbed away. This is not spiritual inheritance; it is ritual preservation. The pinecone did not lose its meaning when it crossed from paganism to Christianity. It merely changed hands. What was once the staff of Osiris is now the staff of the bishop. What once stood in the temple of Isis now stands in Rome. Beneath the surface of doctrine and dogma, the symbols tell the real story; and it’s one of continuity, not conversion.
The serpent offered forbidden sight. Osiris promised hidden resurrection. The pinecone still stands — as a silent witness to which god the Church has never truly left behind.
From these examples (and there are many others), critics compile a pattern: the Catholic aesthetic is riddled with pagan/Luciferian symbols – sun disks, obelisks, eyes, serpents, cosmic stars, etc. One extensive study notes “the sunburst monstrance, radiant halos, priestly miters and tiaras, keys and winged lions, even the orientation of churches – all these can be traced to pre-Christian worship of sun, stars, and nature.”
(The god of nature is Pan; the goat-demon, the soul of Osiris; in other words, Baphomet).
Freemasonic Influence and Infiltration Allegations
Adding fuel to the fire, numerous claims exist that Freemasons or Luciferians have infiltrated the Church’s hierarchy – particularly around the time of Vatican II (the 1962–65 council) which introduced sweeping modernizing reforms. Freemasonry has long been seen as a Lucifer-friendly secret society (at least by its 19th-century critics), and any whiff of Masonic language or practice in Catholicism sets off alarms. For instance, Freemasons speak of seeking “Light” (esoteric knowledge); they call their lodges “Temples of Light” and ultimately revere Lucifer as the bearer of Enlightenment. In the infamous words of 33° Mason Albert Pike (1871): “Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! … Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light…? Doubt it not!”. Pike’s meaning is that what the uninitiated think is “dark” (Lucifer) is actually Light. This encapsulates the Luciferian creed within high Masonry – and it is precisely this creed that critics suspect has crept into the Church.
They point to how often Catholic documents use words like “enlightenment,” “illumination,” “new springtime,” “renewal,” etc., and how certain post-Vatican II rites changed traditional wording. (For example, some prayers and hymns began to emphasize “light” and “life” in ways that, allegedly, mirror Masonic invocations of the “Inner Light.”) While such terms are also biblical, conspiracy writers scrutinize whether these shifts were intentional signals. A particularly bold allegation is that certain clergy themselves were secret Freemasons or Satanists who enacted rites within the Vatican. Author and ex-Jesuit Malachi Martin famously warned of a “satanic infiltration” reaching the highest levels. In his semi-fictional account Windswept House, he described a ritual in 1963 called “The Enthronement of the Fallen Archangel Lucifer” taking place simultaneously in the Vatican and the U.S., essentially enthroning Satan in the heart of the Church. Martin later asserted this was not mere fiction. He and others have noted that June 29, 1963 – just a week after pope Paul VI’s election – was (in occult lore) the ideal time for such an enthronement (the significance being a pope named “Paul” for the first time, fulfilling a satanic prophecy).
While these claims are hard to verify, it is documented that Catholic clergymen have been accused of Freemasonry – enough that pope Paul VI in 1972 lamented “through some crack, the smoke of Satan has entered into the temple of God.”. He spoke of unrest and dissent in the Church, but many took it literally. Subsequent investigations (e.g. by Cardinal Gagnon in the late 1970s) reportedly uncovered lists of Vatican officials who were lodge members. If true, this means individuals who subscribe to Pike’s brand of Luciferian symbolism might have been shaping Church policy. Indeed, some phrases and gestures in reformed liturgy are singled out: for example, the new Mass’s emphasis on “the people’s enlightenment” or the priest facing the congregation (as if “initiating” them) – small things, but in conspiracists’ eyes they carry dual meanings. A Freemason in hiding could privately interpret the “light” invoked at Mass as Lucifer’s light, even as the congregation thinks it’s Christ. This duality – Christ on the surface, Lucifer underneath – is exactly the scenario that alarms critics of a “Luciferian RCC.”

Parallels in Occult Doctrine: Crowley’s “Luciferian” Christianity?
To fully grasp the scope of this symbolic corruption, we must turn to the writings of Aleister Crowley (1875–1947), one of the most notorious occultists in modern history. Crowley’s philosophy, known as Thelema, is drenched in anti-Christian sentiment and openly embraces the very themes of light, resurrection, and spiritual identity that appear; disguised; in Catholic symbolism. The overlap is not accidental. It is the inverse reflection of the same mystery; what some might call a “diabolical mirror.”

Crowley adopted the name “Baphomet” when he became the head of the Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.), a secretive order deeply tied to esoteric and Masonic traditions. In his writings, Crowley redefined Baphomet as a sacred androgynous figure representing the fusion of opposites; male and female, divine and human, light and darkness. Far from mere myth, he explicitly equated Baphomet with Osiris, the Egyptian god of resurrection, and Father Mithras, a solar deity of sacrifice and rebirth. “Baphomet = Father Mithras = Osiris,” he wrote, forming a triune identity of the so-called dying-and-rising god; essentially a pagan parody of Christ.

Mithras, above, often hailed as a solar deity in the Roman Empire, was far more than just a sun god. Beneath the surface, his cult was deeply tied to the older, darker figure of Saturn; or Kronos in Greek; the devourer of time and god of death, limitation, and the hidden sun. While Mithras slays the cosmic bull in his famed tauroctony, surrounded by zodiac signs, what he truly represents is the force of cosmic control through blood and sacrifice; all themes tied directly to Saturnian worship. Saturn ruled Capricorn, whose ancient symbol included the goat , forming the roots of what later became known as Baphomet, the hybrid beast Crowley revered.. These were not different gods; they were successive masks of the same entity: the god of this world, the hidden light-bearer, the beast cloaked in cycles of death and false resurrection.
The serpent, too, is no minor symbol. In Mithraic temples; the mithraea; serpents are carved around altars, shown drinking the bull’s blood. It is the same serpent seen in ancient depictions of Saturn, in Gnostic imagery, and in magical systems that revere kundalini energy as the hidden fire. The serpent here is the initiate, the one who absorbs life-force through ritual sacrifice, and who unlocks forbidden wisdom; just as he promised in Eden: “Ye shall not surely die... your eyes shall be opened” (Genesis 3:4-5). In this framework, the serpent doesn't just tempt — he initiates. He becomes the gatekeeper of esoteric knowledge, wrapping himself around the axis of time and blood, just as he does in Mithras' ritual slaying.
When Jesus confronted the religious leaders of His day, He didn’t mince words. He said plainly in John 8:44: “Ye are of your father the devil… He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth… for he is a liar, and the father of it.” That same liar, the original serpent, has worn many names; Saturn, Osiris, Mithras, Baphomet; and his fingerprints are still visible today. Whether on altars, in symbols, or embedded into rituals cloaked in light, the same serpent spirit seeks blood, worship, and deception. If the Church has enthroned Osiris, and if Osiris is Saturn, and if Saturn is the serpent’s throne; then what is truly being worshipped behind the veil?
For Crowley, Baphomet wasn’t a demon to fear but the true face of enlightened divinity, hidden behind centuries of religious distortion. In his Gnostic Mass, a ritual parody of the Catholic liturgy, the creed even proclaims belief in “the Serpent and the Lion; Mystery of Mysteries; in His name Baphomet.” This fusion of lion and serpent evokes both solar and chthonic power: the lion as a symbol of the sun, and the serpent as the wisdom-bearing force of the underworld. It also mirrors biblical paradoxes; Baphomet becomes the occult’s “true Christ,” not the man from Galilee, but the perfected being born of sacrifice, duality, and initiation. To Crowley, Christ was just another Osiris, another Lucifer. The only difference in the new Aeon is that the mask has been removed.
The concept of the “Lion-Serpent” plays a central role in Crowley’s mystical framework. He used the Greek term Leontos Ophis; lion-serpent; to describe the hidden divine force animating the universe. It was a cipher for Lucifer, the secret fire of enlightenment buried in matter. This force was embodied in Hadit, a serpent god in his system, representing the latent god within each individual. The lion, linked to solar kingship, and the serpent, tied to kundalini energy and underworld wisdom, when united produced a divine “child”; a symbol of the new, awakened self. “The lion and the serpent are united in the stone, and from their marriage is born the child,” Crowley wrote, describing the alchemical rebirth that takes place in ritual. This child, Horus, represents the triumph of personal divinity over blind obedience. Once again, Luciferian light is presented as the true light; one earned through gnosis, not grace.
Underlying all of this is Crowley’s reliance on the Osirian formula of initiation: death, dismemberment, descent into the underworld, and resurrection into godhood. This is the same symbolic arc that Christianity professes in the death and resurrection of Christ; but for Crowley, it was not a path to salvation through God, but apotheosis through self. His initiation rites, especially within the O.T.O., involve the candidate symbolically dying (often as Hiram, the slain builder of Masonic lore, or as Osiris himself) and being reborn as a magical child, (a goat) an enlightened being. The parallels to baptism and the Christian mystery of death to sin and rebirth in Christ are uncanny. But in Crowley’s case, the resurrection leads not to communion with God, but to identification as god; Baphomet, Osiris, the Light-Bearer himself.
This brings us to perhaps the most disturbing parallel: Crowley’s version of the Eucharist. In his infamous Gnostic Mass (Liber XV), bread and wine are consecrated; not as symbols of Christ’s body and blood, but as vessels of personal deification. The celebrant consumes the sacrament and declares, “There is no part of me that is not of the gods.” In place of Christian humility, there is bold Luciferian self-assertion. The Eucharist becomes a magical act of becoming divine. Crowley believed that through repeated ritual communion, the practitioner would be slowly transformed, his human nature replaced with godhood: “God manifest in flesh will be his name.” And in doing so receives the mark of the beast.

Even more graphic is Crowley’s private ritual known as the Mass of the Phoenix. In this rite, the practitioner creates a “Cake of Light,” sometimes including bodily fluids like semen or menstrual blood, symbolizing life essence. He then offers the cake to fire, consumes a second cake smeared with blood from a self-inflicted wound, and proclaims his liberation from grace and guilt: “This bread I eat. This Oath I swear… There is no grace; there is no guilt; This is the Law: Do what thou wilt.” It is, in every way, a blasphemous inversion of the words spoken at the Last Supper. Crowley calls upon Ra, the sun god, and Horus, the conquering child, to sanctify the act. It is a solar Eucharist, a celebration of the self as god. And hidden behind the bread and wine is always Osiris—the original god of ritual dismemberment and resurrection.
To eat the cake is to eat Osiris; and in doing so, to declare: I am him. It is not remembrance. It is possession. What the Church timidly calls “communion,” Crowley exposes for what it truly is: consumption; an act of taking godhood into oneself, not to adore, but to become.
When the Church dares to say “Christ is present” in this rite. But how can Christ; the sinless, commandment-keeping Son of God; be present in a system that openly violates His Word at every turn? They bow before carved images in violation of Exodus 20. They changed the Sabbath, trampling the command of the Most High. And worst of all, they command their followers to drink what God Himself forbids; the blood. Leviticus 17:10 does not leave room for metaphor or ritual exemption: “I will set my face against that person who eats blood and will cut him off from among his people.”
So ask yourself: who is truly being invoked on their altar?
Because it is not the Christ who said, “If you love Me, keep My commandments.” It is not the Holy Spirit, who never contradicts Scripture. It is not the God of Abraham, who thundered against idolatry and demanded holiness.
The one who demands broken commandments, drinks of blood, welcomes inversion, and rewards ritual mimicry is not God; but a counterfeit. And if their altar imitates the occult in symbol, in spirit, and in sacrament, then maybe it’s because it was never sanctified to begin with.
It is not the presence of Christ. It is the enthronement of another.the occultist says “I am god.” The parallels are not just symbolic. Crowley understood the Catholic structure intimately—and he recast it in the image of Luciferian initiation, making plain what the Church may only hint at beneath layers of tradition.
When we juxtapose Crowley’s openly Luciferian ritualism with the contested elements in Catholicism, the parallels are chilling. The Church uses a sun monstrance – Crowley invokes the sun in his Mass. The Church speaks of the “Morning Star, never setting, Christ your Son (Lucifer)” – Crowley names his sacramental deity Baphomet, equating it to Lucifer the light-bearer, and even calls it “the secret Satan or Lord of the night” in some writings. The Church has the faithful consume bread and wine as Christ’s body and blood (when Christ said “It is the Spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing.” )– Crowley makes his followers consume cakes and wine as Osiris’ (or Baphomet’s) body and blood. Both claim that by doing so, the participant is united with God.
The supposed difference, Catholics argue, lies in intention: in their Eucharist, they "claim" to unite with the true God, receiving grace as humble creatures before their Creator. In contrast, in Crowley’s system, the practitioner openly declares themselves divine; claiming the godhead without grace, without repentance, without obedience. But to the outside observer, both rites look disturbingly similar: bread, wine, and the language of becoming “one with the divine.”
But here is the unavoidable question: how can Catholics receive any grace from the Eucharist when they stand in clear violation of God’s commandments?
God does not bless rebellion. He does not pour out grace on altars that lift up graven images in His name. He does not abide with those who break His Sabbath and justify it with tradition. He does not call “holy” the drinking of blood when He has already declared in Leviticus 17:10 that anyone who consumes blood shall be cut off. And He does not send His Spirit to dwell where sin is enshrined and His Word is twisted.
Christ Himself says in John 14:15, “If you love me, keep my commandments.” Grace flows through obedience — not through ritual for its own sake. The Catholic Eucharist may speak of Christ, but the foundation upon which it stands has been eroded by centuries of disobedience and pagan mixture. The bread may be broken, but so is the covenant. And the cup may be lifted, but it does not carry the blood of salvation; it carries the wine of Babylon.

This is the danger of a system that mirrors the truth while serving a lie. The Beast doesn’t come dressed as a monster. He comes wearing a robe, speaking Scripture, holding a chalice, and standing behind an altar. But the spirit behind the ritual is not the Holy Spirit — it is the counterfeit, the deceiver, the one who said in the garden, “Ye shall be as gods.”
And when the Church lifts up the host and says, “This is Christ,” yet tramples His Word, who is really present?
Because the God of Scripture never enters through the back door of idolatry, tradition, and compromise. But the serpent does. And he’s been doing it since Eden.
If our bodies are the temple of God (1 Corinthians 6:19), then the Garden of Eden was the original temple: a sacred dwelling place where God's presence walked freely with man. So when the serpent entered that garden and spoke with divine authority; "Hath God said...?" (Genesis 3:1); it was not a talking animal, but a counterfeit voice, a false light, imitating the divine.
Many traditions connect the serpent to kundalini energy; the coiled spiritual force said to rise through the spine to awaken the "third eye." In this view, the serpent in Eden did not offer simple rebellion, but an esoteric initiation after they ate, a counterfeit enlightenment, severing man from obedience and communion with the true Creator.
The serpent promised Eve hidden knowledge and godhood, but what it delivered was death; spiritual exile.
If the garden was the prototype of the holy temple, then Satan’s serpent; that false fire; was the first profaning spirit, twisting the image of God and replacing divine union with self-deification. What kundalini promises today, the serpent whispered in Eden: You shall be as gods (Genesis 3:5). But it was not empowerment — it was separation.
If Saturn is Osiris: the god of death, cycles, and hidden knowledge: then he is also Kronos, the Titan who rose up against the heavens, severing the order of divine authority and replacing it with time-bound rulership, decay, and counterfeit light.
But who were the Titans? In biblical terms, they echo the fallen angels or their offspring described in Genesis 6 as giants, mighty ones, and men of renown. These beings were not just physical anomalies; they were carriers of forbidden knowledge, corruptors of the earth, and enemies of divine order.
Saturn, like the Titans or Nephilim (their offspring) represents that ancient rebellion, the moment heaven’s authority was challenged from within; not by brute force alone, but by seduction, inversion, and imitation. He is not the light-bringer; he is the false light, the shadow that pretends to illuminate.
"For Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light." (2 Corinthians 11:14)"He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth… for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44)
Saturn, known to the Romans as the god of time and decay, is deeply linked with death, the underworld, and limitation. Though not the destroyer, he is the devourer — the slow force that brings all things to the grave. In Greek myth, Saturn is Cronus, who devoured his own children and ruled the world before being overthrown. In Roman esoteric tradition, Saturn evolved into a chthonic figure associated with darkness, judgment, and the boundary between life and death. In astrology, he rules Capricorn; the goat. In occult systems, Saturn merges with Osiris, the Egyptian god of the dead, becoming a gatekeeper figure between the material and spiritual worlds. Crowley and others identify him as the hidden god of initiation, the black sun, and the force behind false resurrection. Though not the god of hell, Saturn is a god of death; enthroned in time, crowned in ritual, masked in light.
Note: The Nazis also venerated the Black Sun; an esoteric symbol of hidden power and occult rebirth. In parallel, we see a similar duality within Roman religion: the so-called "White Pope" as the public face, and the "Black Pope"; the Jesuit Superior General; operating behind the scenes. It mirrors the same pattern as the false light bearer: a visible light masking a deeper, darker power.
Comentarios