The doctrine of papal infallibility, upheld by the Roman Catholic Church, states that the Pope, when speaking ex cathedra, is incapable of making errors on matters of faith and morals. According to this doctrine, the Pope’s declarations on these matters are considered infallible and must be embraced by all Church members. The formal definition took place in 1870 at the First Vatican Council.
So, it’s time to analyze this in detail.
When the Pope speaks ex cathedra, he discusses crucial matters of faith and morals that all Catholics must embrace. These exceptional declarations encompass the establishment or explication of crucial principles, such as the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption of Mary, along with significant ethical teachings.
In my previous video, I discussed how the concept of the Immaculate Conception lacks biblical support. If Mary was without original sin, she would not have required a savior.
Luke 1:46-47
“And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.”
In this passage, Mary declares that her spirit rejoices in God, her Savior, indicating her recognition of the need for salvation, which underscores that she, too, required a Savior.
Romans 3:23
“For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.”
The Assumption of Mary refers to the belief that the Virgin Mary was taken to heaven, both in body and soul, after her life on earth came to an end. This belief states that Mary did not experience decay in the grave but was instead taken up into heavenly glory.
Which is denied in John 3:13
“And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.”
Let’s take a closer look at the “Holy Fathers” who came before.
Pope Sergius III, who held the papacy from 904 to 911, gained infamy for his ruthless ascent to authority. It is believed that he came into possession of the papal office by committing murder, supposedly plotting the assassinations of his predecessor, Pope Leo V, and his competitor, Antipope Christopher. The time of his papacy is often linked to the era referred to as the “saeculum obscurum” or the “dark age” of the papacy, marked by corruption and moral decline in the Church.
Marozia, an important figure in Roman history, had a notable relationship with Pope Sergius III. Marozia is infamously known for her involvement in the so-called “Rule of the Harlots” or “Saeculum Obscurum” (Dark Age of the Papacy) a period marked by significant corruption and scandal in the papacy.
Powerful Roman families exerted significant influence on the papacy during this period, often leading to political and sexual scandals involving the pope. Marozia’s participation, which involved her connections with several popes and her control over the papal election process, played a role in establishing the era’s notorious reputation for ecclesiastical corruption and instability.
Pope John X, who held office from 914 to 928, played a crucial role in the papacy during the early 10th century. During his papacy, he focused on political and military matters, such as defending Italy against Muslim raiders and strengthening the papal states.
His reign ended in controversy; after being deposed, John X was imprisoned and ultimately murdered under circumstances that remain unclear but are widely believed to have been orchestrated by his political enemies. His death is seen as part of the broader pattern of instability and corruption that characterized the papacy during the so-called “Rule of the Harlots.”
John, the son of Marozia, went on to become Pope John XI, reigning from 931 to 935. During this era of the papacy, her influence, which extended to her connections with Sergius III and her family’s control over the papacy, underscores the noteworthy political and familial intrigues that characterized this period.
Pope Leo VI, also called Leo VI the Thrice-Elected, held the papal office for a short time spanning from February 929 to March 931. The period of his papacy was characterized by political instability and frequent elections caused by intense factional conflicts. He held his position while under the influence of the influential Roman noblewoman Marozia. Leo VI was removed from power in 931 and met a mysterious and probably violent end, which mirrored the overall corruption and unrest within the papacy during that time.
Pope Boniface VII gained a reputation for being involved in theft and financial corruption. While serving as pope, he faced allegations of misappropriating church funds, which involved substantial amounts of money. His time in office was characterized by scandals involving embezzlement and mishandling of funds, which further tarnished the already corrupt and unstable image of the papacy at the time.
Pope John XV’s time as pope was overshadowed by financial scandals and corruption. He was accused of embezzling church funds and misappropriating resources allocated to the pope. He ruled during a period of political instability in Rome and faced persistent problems of financial mismanagement and corruption within the Church.
Pope Benedict VIII, who reigned from 1012 to 1024, was embroiled in notable scandals throughout his time as pope. During his rule, he faced numerous accusations of corruption and misconduct, such as buying and selling church offices and misappropriating church funds.
Benedict VIII’s time as pope was marked by political conflicts and power struggles, which mirrored the larger problems of instability and corruption within the Church at that time.
Pope Clement II was chosen as the successor in 1046 mainly because there were no reputable Roman clergymen available who were considered untainted by scandal. Historical sources indicate that the papal election was motivated by a need to select a candidate who was not affected by the widespread corruption and political disputes of that era. The situation was described as:
“Clement II was appointed because no Roman clergyman could be found free from the scandalous intrigues and corruption that plagued the Church in Rome.”
This demonstrates how the papacy was impacted by moral and political decline during that time, resulting in the choice of Clement II, a German bishop, as a more suitable candidate.
Pope Innocent III, who ruled from 1198 to 1216, was actively engaged in acts of violence, particularly during the Albigensian Crusade. He is known for supporting the crusade against the Cathar heretics in southern France, a campaign that led to extensive violence and the killing of thousands of individuals. Innocent III’s actions were motivated by his goal of eradicating heresy and establishing the dominance of the papacy, resulting in violent military campaigns and the devastation of entire communities. This era emphasizes the utilization of papal authority to enforce religious conformity through violent methods.
Pope Boniface VIII’s tenure as pope, spanning from 1294 to 1303, was characterized by notable controversy and strife. His strong belief in papal authority caused conflicts with King Philip IV of France, which ultimately resulted in the issuance of the controversial papal decree *Unam Sanctam*.
The conflict intensified when Boniface VIII was captured and subjected to mistreatment by agents of Philip IV during the “Outrage of Anagni.”
Over the course of history, numerous popes have been confronted with significant allegations of unethical behavior and criminal wrongdoing.
Pope Alexander VI gained notoriety for his involvement in nepotism and sexual scandals, while Pope Benedict IX faced accusations of engaging in sodomy and immoral behavior. Pope Sergius III was linked to instances of murder and political violence, and Pope John XII was alleged to have been involved in adultery and drunkenness. These instances underscore the major problems of corruption and scandal that have plagued the papacy throughout various periods.
They exhibit the behavior of pagan priests rather than that of representatives of Christ.
Let’s explore the concept of papal infallibility in more depth. The teachings of the Roman Catholic Church claim that baptism removes original sin, which goes against the teachings of God. The Church asserts its authority in matters of faith and morals, raising concerns about the potential sidelining of God’s word.
Canon 1188 states “The practice of displaying sacred images in churches for the veneration of the faithful is to remain in force”, directly opposing God’s commandment against making graven images of heavenly things.
One might start to wonder if this is an effort to perpetuate the worship of their demonic sun god, Baal, and his consort, Semiramis—who could be seen as Satan and Lilith in contemporary terms.
In Catholicism, devotion frequently revolves around Mary and the Rosary, highlighting the importance of repentance for sins and acknowledging human suffering. However, a crucial problem arises: where is the Church’s accountability for the individuals who suffered torture and death during the Inquisition, or for the children whose lives have been irreparably harmed by inadequately addressed and concealed sexual abuse scandals?
Also the teaching of salvation by works completely nullifies the work Christ did by putting Himself in our place to wash away our sins. We can only stand before a Holy God in Christ.
Ephesians 2:8-9 emphasizes the gift of grace:
“For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.”
Isaiah 53:5
“But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.”
Hebrews 10:10
“By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.”
After the sacrifice, 1 Peter 2:24 states:
“Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.”
Surprisingly, they assert that they are the rightful heir to the same Peter.
Could they be the successor to the other Simon Peter, also known as Simon the sorcerer?
Have you ever considered that there might be a purpose behind discouraging people from reading the Bible?
Since the work of Christ on the “cross” is already sufficient and complete, why is there a necessity for priests or popes?
The pope teaches, according to the Code of Canon Law, Canon 749, that
“The supreme pontiff, in virtue of his office, possesses infallible teaching authority when, as supreme pastor and teacher of all the faithful... he proclaims by a definitive act that a doctrine of faith or morals is to be held.”
Yet according to the Bible, it is God’s word itself that is the authority by which the truth is known.
The Bible condemns the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994) for stating in paragraph 2021 that “Grace is the help God gives us to respond to our vocation of becoming his adopted sons. It is the free and undeserved help that God gives us to respond to his call to become children of God, adoptive sons, partakers of the divine nature and of eternal life.”
Romans 4:5
“But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.”
Romans 3:28
“Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.”
Ephesians 2:8-9
“For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.”
Consequently, trying to integrate a believer’s actions into their salvation and perceiving grace as mere “help” goes against biblical teachings.
Romans 11:6
“And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace.”
The gift of righteousness is bestowed upon us by Christ Jesus, solely through His perfect sacrifice.
Romans 5:17
“For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.”
1 Peter 3:18
“For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit.”
2 Corinthians 5:21
“For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.”
The Bible makes it clear that our salvation and righteousness depend solely on Christ’s sacrifice, not on our own works. 1 Peter 3:18 emphasizes that Christ suffered once for sins, the just for the unjust, to bring us to God. 2 Corinthians 5:21 further explains that Christ was made to be sin for us, despite knowing no sin, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.
Hence, any doctrine that includes human efforts in the process of salvation directly opposes the biblical truth that righteousness is a gift solely dependent on Christ’s all-sufficient sacrifice.
Following my previous post on bioethics, I found myself questioning why false doctrines proliferate and why a religious institution feels entitled to dictate how we should manage our reproductive choices by prohibiting contraception and IVF. How does this organization dare to dictate what we should teach our kids, as if its teachings are superior to God’s word?
Why do mere mortals go against God's word by imposing it's views on ending prolonged suffering through assisted suicide?
Frankly, it has no business meddling in other people's affairs. Yet, it stubbornly clings to its façade, relying on human contributions to sustain its existence.
Personally, I remain neutral on these matters, as I feel it is not my role to pass judgment or exert control over others’ lives.
Attempting to control individual choices and beliefs is reminiscent of totalitarianism, similar to the ideologies endorsed by the Nazis, who also had an affinity for sun worship and the occult.
When discussing the Nazis, it is crucial to acknowledge the Vatican’s concerning involvement with Bishop Alois Hudal, which greatly facilitated the escape of several Nazi war criminals, including notable individuals such as Adolf Eichmann and Franz Stangl. Franciscan priests, along with the Vatican Secretariat of State, were instrumental in aiding their escape to South America. This was a component of a broader network that facilitated the creation of fraudulent documents and secure means of escape to avoid punishment. It is truly puzzling that a religious institution as esteemed as the Vatican, which considers the Pope as the “Holy Father,” would partake in morally reprehensible actions. This problematic past raises significant concerns about the moral integrity and ethical obligations of individuals in influential roles within the Church.
The escape routes used by Nazi war criminals were notably referred to as the “ratlines.” These networks, often facilitated by individuals and organizations sympathetic to their cause, provided crucial assistance in helping high-ranking Nazis evade capture and justice. The ratlines involved the use of counterfeit documents, covert means of transportation, and secure locations, mainly directing individuals to South America. Numerous war criminals were able to evade justice and live unnoticed due to this undercover operation. The use of ratlines underscores a disturbing period in history when moral and ethical limits were greatly compromised in the effort to assist individuals who were accountable for some of the most heinous crimes of the 20th century.
Romans 10:3
“For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.”
Anyone beginning to smell a rat yet?
Comments