In this study, we will expose the "eighth-day new creation" as a deception designed to replace the true Sabbath with Sunday worship. We will examine how the eighth day in the Torah was never a sacred day of worship, but rather a symbol of completion and transition within God's divine order. Finally, we will explore whether obelisks serve as tools or gateways, channeling spiritual power to manipulate and control the masses.
The concept of the eighth day has long existed in the Torah and Hebrew traditions, long before Christ’s resurrection. However, this concept has been manipulated, twisting it into a justification for a false “new creation” doctrine, replacing the true seventh-day Sabbath with a fabricated system. The Roman Catholic Church asserts that Christ’s resurrection on Sunday (which, upon reading Scripture carefully, is clearly false) ushered in a so-called "eighth day" of worship. But does the Bible itself support this claim? Or is it yet another attempt to sever believers from the eternal covenant that God established?
The eighth day in Scripture is associated with completion, renewal, and a transition into a new order, yet nowhere in the Bible does it abolish the seventh-day Sabbath. Before Christ’s resurrection, the Torah already contained numerous examples of the eighth day being used for specific purification, consecration, and renewal rituals, but it was never presented as a replacement for the weekly Sabbath. Circumcision was commanded on the eighth day, marking an infant’s entrance into the covenant, a foreshadowing of heart circumcision through Christ. The priesthood followed an eighth-day pattern, with Aaron and his sons undergoing a seven-day ordination before officially beginning their duties on the eighth day. The Feast of Tabernacles had an eighth-day assembly, a final convocation, but it was never a new weekly day of worship. Even in purification laws, those cleansed from leprosy or bodily defilement had to bring an offering on the eighth day, signifying restoration, but none of these laws established a new day of worship.
The eighth day was a prophetic shadow of the Messiah, pointing toward His fulfillment of the covenant. Just as circumcision on the eighth day foreshadowed the circumcision of the heart, Christ’s priesthood, which follows the order of Melchizedek, fulfilled the eighth-day consecration pattern. The eighth day of Sukkot symbolized the ultimate new creation, the eternal kingdom where time itself is transcended. Revelation speaks of a new heaven and a new earth, a future beyond the weekly cycle, but nowhere does it establish Sunday as the Sabbath. Isaiah prophesied that in the final new creation, all flesh will continue to worship God on the Sabbath, proving that it remains eternal.
The early believers did not corrupt the eighth day, but they also did not twist it into a new day of worship. They recognized its prophetic fulfillment but continued to keep the seventh-day Sabbath, as evidenced by the apostles observing it long after Christ’s resurrection. Jesus declared Himself Lord of the Sabbath, not of a new Roman institution. It was not Christ who changed the Sabbath, but Constantine in AD 321, enforcing Sunday as the official day of worship in honour of the sun god. The Roman Catholic Church later cemented this change, claiming authority to alter God’s law, fulfilling the prophecy in Daniel that a beast power would seek to change times and laws.
The eighth day of Sukkot, also known as Shemini Atzeret, holds deep prophetic significance.
In Revelation 21:1, John sees a new heaven and a new earth, a renewed creation where time itself is no longer measured by earthly cycles. This vision aligns with Isaiah 66:22-23, where God declares that in the new creation, all flesh will continue to come and worship before Him from Sabbath to Sabbath. This prophecy clearly shows that even in the eternal kingdom, the Sabbath remains. It is never abolished or replaced.
Nowhere in Revelation, Isaiah, or any other prophetic text is Sunday ever established as a replacement for the Sabbath. The eighth day of Sukkot does not introduce a new weekly day of worship but rather points to a time beyond the limitations of earthly life—a time when God's people will dwell with Him forever.
The Roman Catholic Church misuses the concept of the eighth day to claim that Sunday worship is the new day of rest, but Scripture does not support this claim. The true eighth day is the ultimate restoration of all things, the moment when heaven and earth are renewed, and God's people experience eternal communion with Him. The weekly Sabbath is an integral part of God’s eternal design, making it clear that Rome’s so-called “eighth day” of worship is nothing more than a man-made fabrication.
The seventh-day cycle is sacred, divinely established from Creation and upheld throughout Scripture, never to be broken or replaced. The number seven represents completion, divine order, and covenant, while the concept of an eighth day does not override it. Instead, it functions within God’s appointed times as a transition or renewal, but it never stands as an independent cycle. God never ordained the eighth day as a holy day of rest or worship.
What Rome also refuses to acknowledge is that all true believers are now a royal priesthood, a holy nation set apart by Christ, not man. The hierarchical priesthood of the Old Covenant was fulfilled in Him, making every believer a priest under His eternal authority. This directly contradicts the Roman Catholic hierarchical priesthood, which falsely elevates a select group of men as intermediaries between God and man.
Even more contradictory is the Roman Catholic Church’s claim to apostolic succession, which is built upon Peter as their alleged first pope. Yet, Peter himself, in 1 Peter 2:9, declares that all believers are a royal priesthood.
"But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light."
If Peter truly believed in a separate priestly hierarchy, why would he affirm that every follower of Christ shares in this priesthood? How can Rome claim apostolic authority while denying the very words of the apostle they claim to follow?
By upholding a priestly hierarchy, Rome has positioned itself as a gatekeeper between God and His people, despite the fact that Christ’s sacrifice removed the need for human mediators. The veil in the temple was torn at His crucifixion (Matthew 27:51), signifying that access to the Father was fully restored. Yet, the Roman system rebuilt what God Himself had abolished, keeping people spiritually enslaved to an institution rather than leading them directly to Christ. The veil was torn at the crucifixion, ending the need for a priestly class to stand between humanity and God, yet Rome continues to claim power over salvation, enforcing a system of spiritual enslavement that Christ already abolished.
A Contradiction of the New Covenant
The Roman Catholic priesthood is built upon a fundamental error—the belief that a select group of men holds exclusive authority to mediate between God and man. This hierarchical system not only contradicts the teachings of Christ and the apostles but also nullifies the very purpose of the New Covenant. The claim to apostolic succession, the role of priests as mediators, and the sacramental system all hinge on the assumption that Christ’s work on the cross was not fully sufficient—an assumption that is fundamentally flawed and unbiblical.
To understand why the Roman Catholic priesthood is a lie, one must return to the crucifixion itself. When Christ died, the veil in the temple was torn from top to bottom (Matthew 27:51, Mark 15:38, Luke 23:45). This was no minor symbolic gesture—it was a direct act of God, announcing that the Old Covenant priesthood was finished. Under the Levitical system, only the high priest (Not pontifex maximus, he remained a servant of Jupiter) could enter the Most Holy Place, and even then, only once a year to offer atonement for the people. The function of the priesthood was to stand between God and man, offering sacrifices for sin because access to God was restricted.
The tearing of the veil signified that this barrier was now permanently removed. Christ Himself became the one and only High Priest, entering the true Holy Place once and for all (Hebrews 9:11-12). If Christ fulfilled the function of the priesthood, then what need is there for a new priesthood to take its place? There is none. The work of mediation that once belonged to the Levitical priesthood is now fulfilled in Christ.
But how could Rome maintain its hold over the empire if the priesthood was no longer essential? After all, the pontifex maximus was the emperor himself. The answer? More deception—forged succession, fabricated documents, doctrinal distortions, and an endless web of lies designed to twist the truth and keep control firmly in their grasp.
Rome’s rulers, particularly Caesar, refused to bow to Christ, rejecting His authority as King of Kings. In John 19:15, when Pilate presented Jesus to the Jews, they cried out, “We have no king but Caesar.” This moment was not just about Jewish leaders rejecting Christ—it symbolized the broader reality that Caesar himself demanded absolute loyalty, refusing to acknowledge any authority above his own.
Sound familiar?
This is precisely why Jesus made His famous statement in Matthew 22:21:
“Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.”
Christ was making it clear—Caesar’s domain was earthly, temporary, and limited, whereas God’s reign is eternal. But this statement was also a direct challenge to Caesar’s claim of divinity. In Rome, the emperor was not just a ruler—he was considered a god, demanding worship from his subjects. The title pontifex maximus, meaning "greatest bridge-builder," signified that the emperor was the supreme religious authority, the link between the people and the gods. The antichrist perhaps?
For Christ to declare a kingdom not of this world (John 18:36) and for His followers to acknowledge Him as Lord and King was an open defiance of Caesar’s divine status. If Jesus was truly the Son of God, then Caesar was a fraud, his claim to divine authority a mere illusion. The early Christians understood this, which is why they refused to worship Caesar, even under the threat of death.
But how could Rome tolerate a movement that rejected its imperial god-king? If people recognized that Christ alone was their High Priest and King, then Rome’s entire religious and political structure would crumble. So, rather than fight Christianity outright forever, they did what Rome had always done—co-opted it, absorbed it, and twisted it to serve their own power.
The Church of Rome, still clinging to the imperial title of pontifex maximus, placed itself as the new mediator between man and God. Caesar may have passed away, but his system lived on in the papacy, which would rule not just over an empire but over the souls of men themselves.
Is this why the pope seeks to usurp Christ’s place, declaring himself His representative on Earth? When in reality, he stands as a barrier between God and His own people, inserting himself where only Christ belongs? Instead of leading people to God, he claims authority over them, demanding their submission under the guise of religious leadership. He calls himself Holy Father, a title that belongs to God alone (John 17:11)—a complete blasphemy, an open act of self-exaltation, mirroring the very arrogance of Caesar himself.
If Christ alone is the way, the truth, and the life (John 14:6), then why does the pope claim absolute authority over Christ’s Church? Christ does not need an earthly representative—especially not from the very empire that murdered Him. If the veil was torn, granting all believers direct access to the Father, then why does the pope position himself as an intermediary, forcing people to submit to his system, his sacraments, and his decrees?
The answer is undeniable—the papacy is not the representative of Christ, but rather the continuation of the Roman Empire cloaked in religious authority.
And if the papacy is simply the old Roman rule in disguise, then could the inverted cross be a silent admission of its true allegiance? They claim it symbolizes Peter’s crucifixion, yet throughout history, the inverted cross has been a mark of rebellion, mockery, and opposition to Christ. Could it be a veiled confession that this system has never truly served Christ but has always stood against Him?
The Catholic Church’s Contradiction: Rebuilding the Barrier That God Removed
Despite the tearing of the veil, the Roman Catholic Church reinstated a priestly hierarchy, positioning itself as the exclusive mediator between man and God. It claims that the apostles passed down their authority in an unbroken chain, giving only the Catholic clergy the power to forgive sins, administer sacraments, and act as spiritual mediators. This denies the very essence of the New Covenant, which declares that all believers now have direct access to the Father through Christ.
If God Himself removed the need for a priesthood, why did Rome reinstate it? The answer is simple: control. A direct relationship between man and God removes the need for an institutional hierarchy. It eliminates priestly power, leaving no earthly gatekeepers between God and His people. If believers can approach God directly, then the entire structure of the Roman Catholic Church collapses. There would be no need for priests to forgive sins, no need for the sacraments, and no need for Rome’s spiritual authority.
But instead of embracing the freedom of the New Covenant, Rome restored the chains of religious dependency, binding people to an institution rather than to Christ. The Roman Catholic priesthood is not a continuation of the apostolic church—it is a revival of the pagan priesthoods of Egypt, Babylon, and Rome, which operated under the exact same system: a ruling priestly class that dictated access to the divine.
The Obelisk, the Pyramidion, and Rome’s Hidden Allegiance
The triangular shape of the pyramid in ancient Egypt was not just a design choice—it was an intentional connection to their sun god, Osiris-Ra. The pyramidion, the pointed capstone at the top of a pyramid or obelisk, was believed to serve as a spiritual conduit, channeling divine energy from the sun to the earthly realm. The ancient Egyptians believed their pharaohs, like Caesar, were considered divine and would use this structure as a pathway to the afterlife, ascending through the pyramid’s apex into the realm of the gods.
The obelisk, a towering monument with a pyramidal top, functioned similarly. Often covered in gold or electrum to reflect the sun, it stood as a symbol of power, divine rulership, and the enduring presence of the gods on earth (Fallen angels).
Each obelisk was a monument of allegiance to the sun god, reinforcing the authority of those who ruled beneath them.
When Rome seized power, it did not discard these pagan symbols—it absorbed them. The Vatican Obelisk, taken from Heliopolis, Egypt, was originally built by the pharaohs to honour Ra. Later, Caligula transported it to Rome in 37 AD, placing it in his circus (a Roman chariot racing stadium), the Circus of Nero. For centuries, it stood near the location where many early Christians, including traditionally St. Peter himself, were said to have been martyred under Nero's rule.
Then, in 1586, under the authority of pope Sixtus V, the obelisk was relocated to the center of St. Peter’s Square, where it still stands today. Sixtus V, as part of his urban renewal efforts, sought to rearrange Rome’s obelisks, moving them to prominent locations that would align with major basilicas and roads. Jesuit architect Domenico Fontana was commissioned to oversee the enormous task of transporting and erecting the obelisk in its new location. This was a deliberate placement, ensuring that the ancient Egyptian monument became the central focal point of the Vatican.
The deception never ends.
The Vatican officially claims that the obelisks—particularly the Vatican Obelisk in "St. Peter’s Square"—serve as symbols of Christianity’s victory over paganism.They claim that by relocating and reinterpreting these monuments, the Church has somehow "sanctified" them—but how can sinners sanctify anything? They insist that these symbols have been stripped of their original meaning and repurposed as Christian icons, yet their pagan origins remain undeniable.
In reality, it's nothing more than a gateway to the false gods.
Pope Sixtus V, who ordered the obelisk’s placement in 1586, sought to present it as a monument to Christ’s triumph, even adding a cross to its peak (the ancient sun symbol). The official narrative suggests that since the obelisk once stood in the Circus of Nero, where early Christians, including Saint Peter, were martyred, it now serves as a reminder of their sacrifice and the Church’s endurance.
However, this explanation raises serious contradictions. If the obelisk was truly a relic of a defeated religion, why preserve it at all? The Bible consistently commands the destruction of pagan idols and monuments—not their repurposing. When Israel entered the Promised Land, God commanded them to tear down pagan altars, burn their sacred poles, and destroy their graven images (Deuteronomy 12:2-3). The Vatican, however, did the exact opposite, taking the most sacred object of Egyptian sun worship and placing it at the very center of its religious power.
If the Vatican truly represented Christ, why would it need to physically carry the legacy of sun worship into its own spiritual center? If the goal was to erase pagan influence, why does the obelisk remain standing unbroken, with its original pyramidion intact? And if this structure was once dedicated to Osiris-Ra, the sun god, what does that say about its placement in the very heart of the Vatican?
The presence of the obelisk in St. Peter’s Square does not symbolize the defeat of false gods—it signifies their continued presence, hidden beneath the layers of religious reinterpretation.
If the Vatican truly represents Christ, why does it maintain a direct connection to the gods of old?
If the pyramidion was constructed to harness the sun’s power, drawing fire from the heavens, its symbolism bears an uncanny resemblance to Lucifer, the light-bringer, the bearer of forbidden knowledge and counterfeit divine power.
In Revelation 13:13, the false prophet is described as calling down fire from heaven in the sight of men, using false miracles to deceive the world. This act of manipulating divine power mirrors the very essence of Lucifer’s deception—offering a counterfeit light, a false godhood, a fabricated divinity.
If the pyramidal structure of both the pyramid and the obelisk was intentionally designed to channel celestial energy, then perhaps these structures are far more than mere monuments. Their purpose may be deeply rooted in an ancient knowledge—one that was not of God, but of the adversary. If Lucifer, the so-called light-bringer, promised mankind forbidden knowledge and power, could these structures serve as physical representations of that very promise?
Rather than standing as relics of past civilizations, do they instead embody the adversary’s greatest deception—bringing his own false “divine light” to humanity? A light not of God’s truth, but one of illusion and rebellion—an attempt to elevate man through secret knowledge, through hidden wisdom, through self-exaltation, just as Lucifer tempted Eve in Genesis 3:5, whispering that she could become like God.
If these structures still hold spiritual significance today, then who continues to draw power from them? And why do the centers of earthly power—from the Vatican to New York—preserve and revere these monuments?
And here lies a critical question: If the pope is not the false prophet, then why does the pyramidion atop an Egyptian obelisk stand directly outside his very dwelling place, St. Peter’s Basilica?
If this were truly the seat of Christ’s Church, why would it maintain a structure designed to bring divine power down from the heavens? If the pope serves the Most High, why does his domain embrace the very same pagan relics that honoured the prince of the power of the air? If obelisks were mere decorations, why would they be placed with precise alignment in Vatican City, New York, London, Paris and other global centers of power—mirroring the same layout as ancient Egypt?
The false prophet is described in Revelation as one who performs deceptive miracles and leads the world astray, working in service of the Beast. What greater illusion could there be than a man who claims to be Christ’s representative, while standing beneath a monument to Lucifer’s counterfeit light? What greater deception than one who proclaims holiness while ruling from a seat of hidden power, veiled in the very symbols of ancient rebellion against God?
If the pope is not the false prophet, then why is his kingdom built upon the very foundations of pagan worship, hidden knowledge, and Luciferian architecture? Why does his dominion preserve the monuments that the true God commanded His people to destroy? These symbols are not mere artifacts of history. They are testaments to the continuation of a system that has never truly served Christ, but has instead stood in opposition to Him from the very beginning.
If the pyramidal structure of both the pyramid and the obelisk's top was intentionally designed to channel celestial energy, then perhaps these structures are far more than mere monuments. Their purpose may be deeply rooted in an ancient knowledge—one that was not of God, but of the adversary. If Lucifer, the so-called light-bringer, promised mankind forbidden knowledge and power, could these structures serve as physical representations of that very promise?
Lucifer’s greatest lie in the Garden of Eden was that man could become like God (Genesis 3:5). If Lucifer is the light-bringer, then the pyramidion—the capstone of the pyramid—is the very source of that power, the place where the supposed "divine light" descends, granting mortals access to forbidden knowledge and false godhood. In the ancient mystery religions, this was not just symbolic—it was believed to be a direct conduit for supernatural power.
If the pyramidion represents Lucifer’s gift to mankind, then every obelisk that still stands today—especially in places of power like the Vatican—is a testament to that false promise. The elites of the ancient world, the pharaohs, the emperors, and the rulers of pagan empires, believed that through these structures, they could harness divine power for themselves. If these obelisks remain central to the modern world’s most powerful institutions, what does that say about who truly rules from the shadows?
Revelation 18:23:
"And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived."
The question remains: If the Vatican truly serves the Most High, why does it stand as a custodian of the very symbols that honoured the adversary?
If the one true God is the sole source of divine power, why would the center of the Roman Catholic Church be anchored to a symbol of ancient sun worship? The mere presence of the obelisk in the heart of the Vatican suggests that Rome’s spiritual authority is not rooted in Christ, but in something far older, something carried forward from the pagan empires it absorbed.
Revelation 18:2 describes Babylon the Great as:
"And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird."
This passage reveals that Babylon is not just a physical place but a spiritual stronghold, infested with demonic entities, fallen spirits, and corrupting influences. It is described as a dwelling place for every vile creature, meaning that it has become a gateway between realms—a portal through which spiritual wickedness enters our world.
Are Obelisks a Gateway for the gods?
If the pyramidion atop an obelisk was designed to harness celestial power, as the ancient Egyptians believed, could these structures still serve as conduits for spiritual forces? The ancient mystery religions, deeply rooted in Babylonian, Egyptian, and Roman traditions, saw these monuments as sacred tools, acting as antennae to connect the earthly realm with the gods. The pharaohs, emperors, and high priests who erected these structures did not merely see them as decorative symbols—they were functional, serving a supernatural purpose.
The Vatican obelisk, and others in key centers of global power remain perfectly preserved, positioned, and aligned, mirroring the ancient knowledge of star positioning and sacred geometry. Could it be that these are modern-day gateways—structures left behind to channel the same spiritual forces that the ancient world once worshipped? If Babylon is the dwelling place of every foul spirit, could these monuments be the very doorways through which these entities operate?
Are Our Rulers from Another Dimension?
The Bible states in Ephesians 6:12:“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”
If the elite power structures of this world are still building, preserving, and honouring these ancient obelisks, then what are they truly aligned with? Could they be operating under spiritual guidance from another dimension, from the same fallen entities that ruled in ancient Babylon, Egypt, and Rome? The rulers of this world—kings, emperors, popes, and global elites—have always sought hidden knowledge, control over the masses, and communion with unseen forces. Could they be servants, not of God, but of those who dwell in the shadows, beyond the veil of this reality? Or are they the fallen angels themselves?
If these obelisks were nothing more than historical relics, why do they still stand in the most influential places on Earth? Why are they placed with such precision, mirroring the same alignments seen in ancient star maps and temples of worship?
The deception is that humanity believes it is ruled by men, but in reality, the true rulers of this world may not be human at all. Whether through direct possession, spiritual manipulation, or ancient bloodlines, the forces that govern this world do not serve God but the prince of the power of the air. The obelisks—whether in Rome, London, Egypt, Paris, or New York—may serve as physical markers of their continued dominion, standing as silent witnesses to an empire that has never truly fallen but has only changed its disguise.
Revelation 18:12-13:
"The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of brass, and iron, and marble,
And cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men."
Comentarios