The Lord’s Day: Sun Worship Disguised as Christian Doctrine
Building on yesterday’s post, I want to dive even deeper into God’s true calendar, which was deliberately altered by pagan Rome. I appreciate your patience, and if there are any repetitions from yesterday, it’s only to reinforce the importance of this truth.
For centuries, mainstream Christianity has accepted Sunday, commonly referred to as "the Lord’s Day," as the official day of worship and the time to commemorate Christ’s resurrection. But few ask the critical question—where did this practice originate? If Jesus was crucified during Passover and resurrected three days later, shouldn’t His resurrection be tied to the biblical calendar rather than a floating Sunday?
The answer is unsettling. The change from the biblical Sabbath to Sunday and from Passover-based observance to Easter is not rooted in Scripture but in pagan sun worship. The so-called "Lord’s Day" is not about Christ, the Lord of the Sabbath—it is about the sun god.
We know with certainty that Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday because the Feast of Unleavened Bread never changes its date. According to Leviticus 23:5-6, the Lord commanded that Passover must always be observed on the fourteenth day of the first biblical month, Nisan 14, followed immediately by the Feast of Unleavened Bread on Nisan 15. These dates are fixed in God’s calendar (not Rome's) and do not change from year to year.
The Gospel of John confirms that Jesus was crucified on the preparation day for a Sabbath, stating in John 19:31: "The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away." This verse is crucial because it clarifies that the Sabbath following Jesus’ crucifixion was not an ordinary weekly Sabbath but a "high day,"(high sabbath) referring to the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which always falls on Nisan 15.
Since Jesus prophesied in Matthew 12:40 that He would be in the grave for "three days and three nights," the traditional Friday crucifixion to Sunday morning resurrection does not fit because it only accounts for one full day and two nights—not the three days and three nights that Jesus Himself declared. The only way for this prophecy to be fulfilled is if Jesus was crucified on Wednesday, Nisan 14, and buried before sunset, just before the High Sabbath of Nisan 15 began.
By this timeline, Wednesday night would be the first night in the tomb, Thursday the first day, Thursday night the second night, Friday the second day, Friday night the third night, and Saturday the third day. Jesus would then have risen just before sunset on the Sabbath (Saturday), completing exactly three days and three nights. This means Jesus’ resurrection did not happen on Sunday morning, as commonly taught, but on the biblical Sabbath.
Furthermore, the significance of Nisan 14 aligns with the Passover lamb symbolism. According to Exodus 12:6, the Passover lamb was always sacrificed on Nisan 14 at twilight. The Apostle Paul confirms that Christ is our Passover Lamb in 1 Corinthians 5:7, saying: "For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us." Jesus, as the fulfillment of this prophecy, had to be crucified on the exact date of Passover, and His burial before the High Sabbath further confirms this.
Because the Feast of Unleavened Bread is fixed to Nisan 15, and because Jesus had to be buried before that High Sabbath began, it is clear that Nisan 14 must have fallen on a Wednesday in the year of His death. This timeline aligns with Jesus' prophecy about being in the grave for three days and three nights and confirms that He rose just before the biblical Sabbath ended on Saturday evening, not Sunday morning.
How Christianity Was Tied to Pagan Worship
If Jesus was crucified on Nisan 14 and resurrected just before sunset on the weekly Sabbath (Nisan 17), then why does the modern church insist on celebrating a floating Sunday resurrection that moves every year? The answer is deeply unsettling. The practice is not biblical; it is pagan.
This deception is more than a simple miscalculation. It is a complete theological restructuring of Christian worship, removing it from the firm foundation of God's appointed times and replacing it with a system rooted in celestial worship. The very method used to determine Easter—a solar-lunar calculation rather than a biblical fixed date—proves that the practice is pagan in origin. The alteration of laws and appointed times was foretold in the book of Daniel. As it is written in Daniel 7:25
To understand the magnitude of this deception, we must first acknowledge that God has already set a divine calendar for His people.
In Leviticus 23:4-5, God commands:"These are the feasts of the LORD, even holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons. In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the LORD'S passover."
God’s calendar is based on fixed appointed times, with Passover always falling on Nisan 14. This means that Jesus, Lord of the Saturday Sabbath, our Passover Lamb, was crucified on a specific, unchanging date, and His resurrection would have also followed a fixed pattern—three days and three nights later, which was Nisan 17.
Paul confirms in 1 Corinthians 5:7:"Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us."
This passage establishes beyond any doubt that Christ was the fulfillment of the Passover Lamb, sacrificed exactly on Nisan 14, in accordance with the timing set by God Himself. This was never tied to a specific day of the week, but rather to a specific date in God’s calendar.
By contrast, the Roman Church replaced God’s fixed calendar with a floating system based on the movements of the sun and moon rather than on Scripture. Instead of aligning the resurrection with Passover, the Church redefined the date of Easter as the first Sunday after the first full moon following the spring equinox.
This system was not inspired by God but was identical to the pagan Roman method of determining the dates of their fertility and sun-worship festivals.
This fundamentally altered the nature of Christian worship, removing it from God’s authority and placing it under the authority of a man-made religious system.
The Babylonians, Egyptians, and Romans all based their religious festivals on the cycles of the sun and the moon. These celestial bodies were worshiped as deities, and their phases dictated the structure of time itself.
Ancient civilizations, particularly Babylon, Egypt, Greece, and Rome, all practiced astronomical-based worship. The spring equinox was a central moment in the pagan calendar, symbolizing the rebirth of the sun god after winter. The Babylonians honoured Tammuz, the Egyptians celebrated Osiris, and the Romans venerated Mithras, all of whom were linked to solar cycles, fertility, and resurrection myths.
The fact that Easter is determined by the first full moon after the equinox should immediately raise concern for anyone who truly follows Scripture. Nowhere in the Bible is this system given—instead, it mirrors the exact way that pagan cultures determined their religious observances.
The Bible explicitly warns against worship based on celestial cycles.
Deuteronomy 4:19 states:"And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the sun, and the moon, and the stars, even all the host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them, and serve them, which the LORD thy God hath divided unto all nations under the whole heaven."
Despite this clear warning, the Roman Church chose to abandon God’s commanded feasts and instead adopt the exact system He forbade. By basing Easter’s observance on the full moon and equinox, they ensured that Christianity would be permanently tied to the pagan solar-lunar cycle rather than to God’s Word.
The Council of Nicaea (325 AD) was the turning point. The Roman Church made a conscious decision to sever Christianity from its biblical foundation and establish a new religious system that followed the solar-lunar cycles instead. They outlawed the observance of Passover and enforced a Sunday resurrection celebration that followed the equinox and full moon cycle, ensuring it would never align with God’s original appointed times.
This was a direct imitation of the Babylonian, Egyptian, and Roman methods of religious observance.
The adoption of Sunday as the "Lord’s Day" was not a decision based on biblical evidence but a continuation of sun worship. In ancient Rome, Sunday (Dies Solis) was already the primary day of worship for the sun god Sol Invictus (Mithras). The Edict of 321 AD issued by Emperor Constantine solidified this, declaring:
"On the venerable Day of the Sun, let the magistrates and people residing in cities rest, and let all workshops be closed."
This decree was not in honour of Christ but in alignment with solar worship. The Church followed this decree by permanently shifting worship from the biblical Sabbath to Sunday, tying Christian practice directly to the solar-lunar system of pagan Rome.
The Easter calculation itself proves that it is a pagan observance. If it were truly based on Christ’s resurrection, it would follow a fixed date like Passover. But instead, Easter moves because it follows the moon, just like the pagan fertility festivals dedicated to Ishtar, Astarte, and Eostre—the very goddesses from whom the word “Easter” originates. The original Queen of Heaven.
By adopting this floating solar-lunar cycle, Christianity became inseparable from the same religious system that God condemned in Deuteronomy 4:19. Every year, when Easter is observed, it is determined by the movement of celestial bodies rather than the unchanging Word of God. This is an act of religious synchronization with the same system that honoured pagan gods (demons).
The deception runs even deeper when considering the resurrection itself. Scripture tells us that Jesus rose just before sunset on the biblical Sabbath (Nisan 17), not on Sunday morning. The fact that Christianity insists on celebrating a Sunday resurrection proves that the system has been taken over by the same solar-worship structure that ruled Rome.
The theological consequences are enormous. By following a calendar based on celestial movements rather than Scripture, the modern church has completely severed itself from the biblical foundation established by God. Instead of following the fixed dates given by God in Leviticus 23, Christians today follow the same system that was used to worship Tammuz, Osiris, and Mithras—all pagan gods of death and rebirth tied to the sun and moon.
This is not simply an academic discussion—it is the foundation of a false religious system that has distorted Christian worship for over 1,600 years.
Apostolic Succession or Apostolic Deception? The Ultimate Collapse of a Theological Illusion
The doctrine of apostolic succession is the very foundation upon which the Roman Church claims absolute authority. It is the belief that spiritual authority, divine guidance, and even infallibility have been passed down in an unbroken chain from Peter to every pope who has ever sat in his so-called "chair."
If this claim were true, then the Church should be the single most faithful institution to God's commands, unwavering in its commitment to preserving the original teachings of Christ and His apostles. It should be the purest expression of divine truth, incapable of error in matters of faith and doctrine. It should stand as an unshakable pillar of biblical truth, free from corruption, free from compromise, and above all, free from the influence of paganism.
But history proves the opposite.
The very institution that claims apostolic succession has, in fact, overthrown apostolic doctrine, replacing it with a religious system that contradicts the Word of God at its core.
How can it be apostolic succession if it is built on a foundation of deviation, alteration, and contradiction?
This is not just a historical mistake—this is a doctrine of devils (1 Timothy 4:1), a complete inversion of God's truth, a deception so profound that it has led millions into a system that honours man’s traditions rather than God's commandments.
Romans 1:25 exposes this deception:
"Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen."
The moment the Church altered divine law, changed God's appointed times, and replaced His commands with traditions inherited from pagan Rome, it invalidated its claim to be the true successor of Christ’s apostles.
The Self-Destruction of Apostolic Succession: The Infallibility Paradox
The greatest contradiction of apostolic succession is that it demands infallibility while simultaneously proving fallibility through its own historical actions.
If the Church is truly infallible, then it could never have changed God’s appointed times.
If the Church is truly the guardian of divine truth, then it could never have merged biblical doctrine with pagan sun worship.
If the Church is truly the unbroken continuation of the apostles, then it could never have introduced a calendar of worship that contradicts the very pattern set forth by Christ and His disciples.
But that is exactly what happened.
The Sabbath was not merely a Jewish institution—it was established at creation (Genesis 2:3), sanctified by God as a perpetual sign between Him and humanity (Exodus 31:13-17).
If Christ is Lord of the Sabbath (Matthew 12:8), then He cannot also be Lord of Sunday, because He cannot contradict Himself.
How, then, can it claim to be the rightful authority of Christ on Earth?
If it is built on a foundation of changed times, altered laws, and pagan traditions, then it is not the continuation of apostolic authority but a complete rejection of it.
If an institution changes God’s commandments, then it forfeits its right to claim divine authority.
If an institution replaces biblical truth with human tradition, then it is no longer a guardian of Christ’s teachings but a guardian of a counterfeit religion.
The moment the Church altered the appointed times of God, replaced the Sabbath with Sunday, and abandoned Passover in favour of a pagan Easter cycle, it severed its own connection to apostolic truth.
Jesus Himself warned of this deception in Matthew 15:9:
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
A Church that changes the truth of God into a lie, replaces divine worship with sun worship, and follows a religious system based on equinoxes, lunar cycles, and pagan traditions is not built upon Christ.
It is built upon deception.
Apostolic succession is not a divine transmission of authority—it is a historical manipulation of power.
The Inverted Cross, Peter’s Crucifixion, and the Corruption of Apostolic Authority
For centuries, the Roman Catholic Church has built its claim to authority upon the doctrine of apostolic succession, the belief that the pope is the direct spiritual descendant of Peter, whom they insist was the first Bishop of Rome. Central to this claim is the long-held tradition that Peter was martyred in Rome by crucifixion, requesting to be hung upside down because he felt unworthy to die in the same manner as Christ. The Vatican has reinforced this narrative by incorporating the inverted cross into papal imagery, including its presence on thrones and ceremonial chairs. While Catholic tradition insists this symbol represents Peter’s humility, historical scrutiny exposes severe contradictions. There is no biblical or historical evidence that Peter was crucified upside down, nor is there any documentation proving he was even in Rome at the time of his death. Instead, the story appears to be a fabrication designed to bolster the Church’s authority while inverting Christian doctrine itself. The very use of the inverted cross as a symbol of the papacy reveals a deeper theological distortion, one that extends beyond mere symbolism and into the rejection of the true Gospel in plain sight.
The Bible is completely silent regarding Peter’s death. This is significant because Scripture carefully records the deaths of several key figures in the early Church. Stephen’s martyrdom by stoning is described in detail in Acts, and the apostle James, the brother of John, is explicitly recorded as having been killed by King Herod in Acts 12. Paul, writing in 2 Timothy, speaks of his impending execution in Rome. If Peter had truly been crucified, especially in such a dramatic and unconventional manner, why would the biblical authors not have recorded it? The absence of any scriptural mention raises serious doubts about the later claims that Peter died in Rome, let alone that he was crucified upside down.
Vatican 2 Lire: Inverted Cross
The first reference to Peter’s supposed upside-down crucifixion does not appear until the late second century, in an apocryphal text known as The Acts of Peter. This text, which was never included in the biblical canon, is widely recognized as a work of fiction that contains exaggerated and mythical accounts of Peter’s life. The Acts of Peter describes supernatural battles between Peter and the magician Simon Magus, miraculous events that have no historical corroboration, and ultimately Peter’s alleged request to be crucified in an inverted position. The problem with using this text as historical evidence is that it was written at least a hundred years after Peter’s death by anonymous authors who had no direct knowledge of the events. Later Church historians, such as Eusebius of Caesarea in the third century, repeated the tradition of Peter’s crucifixion, but their accounts were based entirely on secondhand reports, not contemporary evidence.
No Roman historian from the first century, including Tacitus, Suetonius, or Cassius Dio, makes any mention of Peter’s execution. This is a glaring omission, considering that Tacitus, in particular, provides a detailed account of Emperor Nero’s persecution of Christians following the Great Fire of Rome in 64 AD. If Peter had been such a prominent figure executed in the capital, why is there no mention of him in these historical records? The Romans meticulously documented executions of high-profile individuals, and yet Peter’s crucifixion is entirely absent from their accounts. This strongly suggests that the tradition of Peter’s execution in Rome was a later invention, not a historical reality.
Further undermining the Catholic claim to Peter’s martyrdom in Rome is the questionable authenticity of his so-called remains. In the 1950s and 1960s, Vatican archaeologists claimed to have discovered Peter’s bones beneath St. Peter’s Basilica. However, the discovery was riddled with problems from the start. The remains were found in a mixed grave containing bones from multiple individuals, meaning there was no way to determine which, if any, belonged to Peter. There is no familial DNA available to verify these claims, and the Catholic Church has never allowed full independent verification by secular scientists. Despite the lack of conclusive evidence, the Vatican has continued to promote the idea that Peter’s bones are housed beneath the Basilica, using this claim to reinforce the legitimacy of the papacy.
If Peter was not crucified upside down, then the very basis for using the inverted cross as a Christian symbol collapses. Instead, what remains is the reality that the inverted cross represents an inversion of Christianity itself. The Vatican’s use of this symbol is not an affirmation of Peter’s humility, but a visible rejection of Christ’s Gospel. Throughout Scripture, the cross represents victory, redemption, and salvation. Christ’s crucifixion is the defining event of the New Testament, the moment in which sin and death were defeated. To invert the cross is to invert that victory, to turn redemption into condemnation. This symbolism is not accidental. The Catholic Church has, throughout its history, consistently exalted human tradition over divine command, and the inverted cross is a perfect representation of this theological inversion.
The fabricated story of Peter’s upside-down crucifixion, the use of the inverted cross as a papal symbol, the abolition of the Sabbath, the alteration of God’s calendar, and the incorporation of solar worship into Christian practice all point to the same unsettling truth: what has been presented as apostolic succession is, in reality, apostolic deception. The weight of historical and biblical evidence proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Peter’s upside-down crucifixion is a myth. It was a later addition, created to strengthen the Vatican’s authority while simultaneously introducing an inverted theology that stands in direct opposition to God’s Word.
If Peter was not crucified upside down, then the justification for the inverted cross as a Christian symbol is a lie. If there is no record of Peter being in Rome at the time of his death, then the foundation of papal authority is a fabrication. If the Church has changed times and laws, replacing the Sabbath with Sunday and Passover with Easter, then its claim to uphold apostolic truth is false. The Vatican has built its authority upon a series of fabrications that reject God’s commandments in favour of human tradition.
The Inverted Cross: A Symbol of Rebellion, Mockery, and the Inversion of Christianity
Throughout history, the inverted cross has been used as a symbol of rejection, rebellion, and inversion of biblical truth. While the Roman Catholic Church insists that it represents the humility of Peter, who, according to unreliable apocryphal sources, was allegedly crucified upside down, outside of Catholic tradition, the inverted cross is universally associated with anti-Christian sentiment, Satanism, the occult, and direct opposition to Christ.
It is essential to recognize that symbols carry meaning based on their historical usage and context, and in almost every case outside of Catholicism, the inverted cross has been used as a deliberate rejection of the Gospel. Its presence in Satanic rituals, occult practices, pop culture, and even anti-Christian governments proves that, far from being an innocent Christian symbol, the inverted cross represents the defiance and perversion of biblical faith.
In Satanism and the occult, the inverted cross is a direct affront to Christ. Satanists openly use the symbol to mock Jesus’ crucifixion, subvert Christian teachings, and represent a complete rejection of God’s authority. It is commonly seen in rituals, black magic ceremonies, and Satanic iconography, where it serves as a deliberate statement of rebellion.
Anton LaVey, the founder of the Church of Satan, incorporated the inverted cross into Satanic rituals, emphasizing its significance as a symbol of anti-Christian defiance. LaVeyan Satanism teaches that Christianity promotes submission, while Satanism promotes self-exaltation, and the inverted cross is used to declare independence from God and embrace self-worship. This association is reinforced by its frequent appearance in occult literature, ritualistic practices, and demonic imagery.
The inverted cross is often worn by Satanists, used in black masses, and displayed in horror films depicting demonic possession or the presence of the Antichrist. Its portrayal in these contexts is always linked to evil, blasphemy, and the rejection of God’s truth. The fact that mainstream entertainment, horror films, and occult groups consistently use the inverted cross in a Satanic context reveals that it is not an innocent Christian symbol, but a universal representation of mockery and rebellion.
The Inverted Cross in Pagan and Anti-Christian Movements
Outside of Satanism, the inverted cross has been widely adopted by anti-Christian movements throughout history. It has been used by atheists, anarchists, and secular humanists as a symbol of disdain for Christianity, Christ, and the Bible.
During periods of heavy Christian persecution, particularly under the Roman Empire, Communist regimes, and totalitarian governments, the inverted cross was sometimes used to desecrate Christian symbols and places of worship. In atheistic regimes such as the Soviet Union and Maoist China, where Christianity was actively suppressed, religious imagery was often defaced, inverted, or destroyed. The cross, as the central symbol of Christianity, was frequently turned upside down as a mark of defiance and rejection of faith.
In modern times, the inverted cross has been incorporated into anti-Christian propaganda, music, and protest movements. Many heavy metal and black metal bands prominently display inverted crosses on album covers, clothing, and stage setups to mock Christianity and promote themes of darkness, chaos, and rebellion. This is not coincidental—the symbol is used precisely because it is understood as anti-Christian, a mockery of Christ’s sacrifice, and a rejection of biblical values.
Additionally, the inverted cross is commonly found in witchcraft, neo-paganism, and Luciferian teachings, where it represents a reversal of divine order, the elevation of self, and a rejection of God’s laws. Many occultists view the cross as a symbol of restriction, representing Christian morality and divine authority. By inverting it, they signal their opposition to Christian doctrine and their allegiance to alternative spiritual forces.
The Inverted Cross as a Symbol of Inverted Theology
The idea of inverting sacred things to pervert their original meaning is a common theme in false religions, heretical doctrines, and spiritual deception. The inverted cross represents an intentional reversal of divine authority, where man's word is placed above God’s Word, tradition is placed above Scripture, and the truth is exchanged for a lie.
This concept is reflected in Daniel 7:25, which warns of a power that will "think to change times and laws", and 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, which speaks of a great falling away and the rise of a figure who exalts himself above all that is called God. The inverted cross is the perfect visual representation of this deception, symbolizing the replacement of God’s law with man’s law and the rejection of the true Christ for a counterfeit.
Historically, those who have inverted biblical truth have often used the inverted cross as a representation of their defiance. The replacement of the Sabbath with Sunday, the observance of lunar-solar cycles instead of God’s appointed times, and the incorporation of pagan worship into Christian practice all mirror the inversion of God’s divine order. The symbolism of the inverted cross aligns with this theological corruption, reinforcing the idea that Christianity has been altered in a way that turns its core message upside down.
The Ultimate Meaning of the Inverted Cross: A Visible Rejection of Christ
Whether used in Satanism, atheism, the occult, or heretical doctrine, the inverted cross is universally recognized as a rejection of Christ, a perversion of Christian truth, and a mark of rebellion. Its presence in Satanic rituals, anti-Christian movements, and theological distortions demonstrates that this symbol is not a sign of faith but of defiance.
The argument that the inverted cross represents Peter’s humility is historically unverified, based on unreliable sources, and completely overshadowed by its universal use as an anti-Christian symbol. There is no scriptural or historical evidence that Peter was crucified upside down, and even if he were, it would not justify the use of an inverted cross as a Christian emblem.
The Catholic Church’s use of this symbol—despite its widespread association with blasphemy—raises serious questions. Why would a Church claiming to represent Christ continue to embrace a symbol that is universally linked to Satanic, occult, and anti-Christian ideologies? If the inverted cross is so easily misunderstood, why has the Vatican not distanced itself from this imagery? The answer lies in the deeper reality that the inverted cross represents an inversion of Christianity itself—a shift from biblical truth to human tradition, from divine command to ecclesiastical authority, from faithfulness to apostasy.
Christians must recognize that symbols carry meaning and that the inverted cross is not a neutral or misunderstood emblem—it is a visible declaration of rebellion. The true cross represents victory, redemption, and the power of Christ’s sacrifice, but the inverted cross symbolizes mockery, rejection, and the perversion of faith.
Just a quick reminder:
1. The Sabbath Was Never Changed by God
Exodus 20:8-11"Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work... For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it."
Isaiah 58:13-14"If thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the LORD, honourable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways... Then shalt thou delight thyself in the LORD."
The Sabbath was never determined by lunar cycles or the movements of the sun and moon. It is a fixed, weekly sign of God's authority, separate from all astronomical worship systems.
2. Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath (Not Sunday)
Matthew 12:8 "For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day."
Luke 4:16"And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read."
Mark 2:27-28"The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath: Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath."
If Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath, then how can He also be Lord of Sunday, a day rooted in sun worship rather than God's command? He cannot be the Lord of both the true Sabbath and a man-made replacement.
3. Christ's Crucifixion & Resurrection Timeline
John 19:31"The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken."
(This confirms that Christ was crucified just before the High Sabbath, meaning it was not the regular weekly Sabbath.)
Luke 23:54"And that day was the preparation, and the sabbath drew on."
(This further proves that Christ’s burial happened just before a Sabbath.)
Matthew 12:40"For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."
(The Friday-to-Sunday resurrection tradition does not fulfill this prophecy—only a Wednesday crucifixion and Sabbath resurrection do.)
4. God’s Warning Against Sun Worship & Changing His Laws
Ezekiel 8:16"And he brought me into the inner court of the LORD’S house, and, behold... five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they worshipped the sun toward the east."
(This shows that sun worship was an abomination before God—yet Sunday worship today is based on solar cycles.)
Deuteronomy 4:19"And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the sun, and the moon, and the stars, even all the host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them."
(Using the sun and moon to determine worship days is forbidden by God.)
Daniel 7:25"And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws."
(The shift from Sabbath to Sunday and from Passover to Easter fulfills this prophecy perfectly.)
5. The Apostles Kept the Sabbath (Even After Christ’s Resurrection)
Acts 13:42-44"And the next sabbath day came almost the whole city together to hear the word of God."
(If the Sabbath had been changed to Sunday, why did Paul still teach on the Sabbath?)
Acts 17:2"And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures."
(Paul continued to keep the Sabbath even when teaching Gentiles.)
Acts 18:4"And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks."
(Paul observed the Sabbath long after Christ’s resurrection, showing that the change to Sunday is not biblical.)
6. God’s True Calendar vs. Man’s Traditions
Leviticus 23:5"In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the LORD'S passover."
(Passover has a fixed date—unlike Easter, which floats according to the equinox and moon cycles.)
Colossians 2:8"Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ."
(Sunday worship and Easter follow man’s tradition, not Christ’s commands.)
Mark 7:7-8"Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
(Christ Himself warns against replacing God's laws with human traditions.)
The Bible warns not to follow man’s traditions over God’s commandments—yet most of Christianity has done exactly that.
The question remains: Will you follow God’s Word or the traditions of men?
Could the inverted crosses on the papal chair symbolize a rejection of the Gospel of Christ and a devotion to the doctrine of devils?
Comments