Today, I will be disproving the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception. This belief claims that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was conceived without original sin and remained sinless throughout her life. While it is upheld as a fundamental teaching of the Roman Catholic Church, a closer examination reveals significant issues with its biblical foundation, theological consistency, and logical coherence.If every human requires redemption, then Mary would not be an exception. The idea that someone could be sinless from conception contradicts the reality that all children are born innocent. As we grow older and reach the age of discernment, when we are exposed to temptation, sin begins to take hold of us. Until that point, children remain free from the knowledge of good and evil, living in a state of purity.
In this discussion, I will present clear evidence and reasoning to challenge this doctrine and demonstrate why it ultimately diverges from the core message of salvation.
It’s important to know that when Mary conceived, she was just but a child, approximately 12 to 14 years old. This might seem shocking by modern standards, but in the context of ancient Jewish culture, it was entirely normal. At that time, young women were often betrothed shortly after reaching puberty, and marriage typically followed soon after. This was not considered unusual or improper but was instead seen as a natural stage of life within the community’s social and religious framework.
Mary’s age at the time of Jesus’ conception is not explicitly stated in Scripture. However, historical and cultural analysis offers us a window into what was typical for Jewish customs during that era. In ancient Jewish society, betrothal (similar to modern engagement but more binding) marked the beginning of a formal relationship that would culminate in marriage. Once a girl was deemed to have reached physical maturity (often around 12 or 13), she was eligible for betrothal. This context aligns with the likely age range of Mary when the angel Gabriel appeared to her with the divine message that she would bear the Son of God.
Understanding Mary’s age at the time of the Annunciation sheds light on her profound faith and courage. To be so young and yet respond with complete trust and submission to God’s will is a testament to her spiritual maturity. Her famous words, “Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word” (Luke 1:38, KJV), are even more powerful when considered in light of her age. Unlike today’s world, where adolescence is often seen as a time of exploration and self-discovery, Mary’s world expected young women to take on the responsibilities of adulthood much earlier.
This context also highlights the gravity of Mary’s situation. Becoming pregnant outside of formal marriage would have subjected her to intense social stigma, potential rejection, and even danger. Joseph’s initial intent to "put her away privately" (Matthew 1:19, KJV) illustrates just how precarious her position was. It’s only after divine intervention, when an angel appeared to Joseph in a dream, that he accepted Mary as his wife and embraced his role in God’s redemptive plan.
Mary’s youthfulness and her humble acceptance of God’s calling serve as a profound example of faith and obedience. It’s a reminder that God often chooses what the world considers insignificant to fulfill His divine purposes. Her story invites reflection on the nature of faith—how trust in God’s plan is not reserved for the experienced or the worldly wise but is accessible to anyone with a willing heart, no matter their age.
But why would this matter? Because, as Scripture reveals, sin entered the world through one man, and humanity has since been subject to its effects. While all are born into a world tainted by sin, Scripture distinguishes between the inherited condition of a fallen world and personal guilt for sin, which requires moral awareness and personal choice. Children, according to biblical teaching, are seen as innocent until they reach an age where they can discern good from evil. Deuteronomy 1:39 provides a clear example of this, stating that the children, who at the time had "no knowledge of good and evil," were permitted to enter the Promised Land. It would be fair to say that children do not commit acts such as murder, adultery, or theft etc, and therefore are sinless until they reach maturity. This verse highlights the principle that, due to their lack of moral understanding, children are not held accountable for sin in the same way adults, who have full moral consciousness, are.
According to Scripture, all children are born without sin. Sin is present in the world, but it is not inherited; each person bears their own burden through the choices they make between good and evil. This truth underscores that all children, including Mary, are born in a state of innocence. When Mary conceived Jesus, she was just a child herself, and like all children, she was born without sin. This emphasizes that every child, by nature, is born—free from the guilt of sin at birth. Therefore, the concept of the Immaculate Conception, as a unique exception for Mary, does not align with the biblical teaching that all children are born pure and innocent, without the guilt of sin, until they reach the age of moral accountability.
"The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him." (Ezekiel 18:20, KJV)
This verse clearly teaches that each person is responsible for their own actions, and one cannot bear the consequences of another's sin. It affirms individual accountability before God.
Therefore, the concept of the Immaculate Conception, as a unique exception for Mary, does not align with the biblical teaching that all children are born pure and innocent, without the guilt of sin, until they reach the age of moral accountability.
However, when Mary reached maturity, like all of us, she may have sinned. Scripture explicitly states that "there is none righteous, no, not one" (Romans 3:10), meaning that no one, including Mary, is exempt from sin after reaching the age of moral understanding. In Isaiah 64:6, the Bible says, "But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags." This underscores the reality that no one is righteous by their own merit and all are in need of redemption. As such, Mary, like the rest of humanity, needed a Savior.
In Luke 1:47, Mary herself declares, "My spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour." This statement clearly acknowledges her need for a Savior, which would not be necessary if she were free from sin. Had Mary remained without sin, she would not have needed a Savior. Additionally, she would not have experienced the knowledge of good and evil that comes with maturity—the point at which sin takes hold in our lives. This further confirms that Mary, like all of humanity, was in need of the Savior, Jesus Christ.
Scripture consistently teaches that all people are sinners in need of salvation, and it affirms that only Jesus was without sin (2 Corinthians 5:21, Hebrews 4:15). Understanding Mary’s role as a faithful servant of God, obedient to His call, allows us to appreciate her example as a model of faithfulness without introducing doctrines that lack a clear biblical foundation. By recognizing her true role, we uphold the core message of Scripture that salvation comes only through Jesus Christ.
Let's examine some Bible verses that highlight the idea that children are innocent and do not yet know the difference between good and evil.
In Isaiah 7:15-16, we read, "Butter and honey shall he eat, that he may know to refuse the evil and choose the good. For before the child shall know to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land that thou abhorrest shall be forsaken of both her kings."
This passage refers to a time when a child will grow to understand the difference between good and evil, implying that children are in a state of innocence before that awareness develops.
In Matthew 18:3, Jesus says, "And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven."
Here, Jesus uses the example of children to illustrate the humility and purity required to enter the kingdom of heaven, suggesting that children possess a moral innocence.
Finally, in Matthew 19:14, Jesus says, "But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven."
This statement affirms that children, with their purity and lack of moral corruption, are closest to the kingdom of heaven, further supporting their innocence.
In Mark 10:13-16, we read: “And they brought young children to him, that he should touch them: and his disciples rebuked those that brought them. But when Jesus saw it, he was much displeased, and said unto them, Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God. Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein. And he took them up in his arms, put his hands upon them, and blessed them.”
In this passage, Jesus emphasizes the need for childlike innocence and humility to enter the kingdom of God, again highlighting the purity of children, which includes their lack of moral knowledge of good and evil.
In Luke 18:16, a parallel to the previous passage, it says, “But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God.”
This passage also underscores the special, innocent nature of children in the eyes of God.
In Matthew 11:25, Jesus says, “At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes.”
Here, Jesus praises the simplicity and purity of children, revealing that the innocence they possess allows them to understand spiritual truths in a way that the "wise" of the world do not.
By disregarding what Scripture says about the innocence of children, the Roman Catholic Church is, in effect, declaring that the gospel is not true, as taught by the prophets Moses and Isaiah, along with the apostles Matthew, Mark, Luke, Paul, and even Christ Himself. In reality, it is the Church that is misleading people and preaching a false gospel, which ultimately leads individuals down the broad path to destruction.
The idea that children do not know good and evil can serve as a compelling argument against the necessity of infant baptism, particularly within the context of traditional Christian beliefs about sin, salvation, and the role of baptism. To understand how this concept challenges the practice of infant baptism, it's important to first consider the biblical basis for sin and the significance of baptism.
Scripture suggests that children, especially infants, are not morally accountable in the same way adults are. In Deuteronomy 1:39, the Bible states that the children of Israel “had no knowledge between good and evil.” This is often interpreted as a reference to their innocence, indicating that children are not capable of understanding or choosing between right and wrong. The idea here is that children, by virtue of their lack of moral awareness, are not in a state of sin. Since sin, according to the Bible, involves a conscious choice to rebel against God, infants, who cannot yet make such choices, are not considered sinners.
In many Christian traditions, baptism is seen as a means of cleansing from sin. The doctrine of original sin, which asserts that all people inherit sin from Adam and Eve, is often cited as the reason infants are baptized. However, if children do not yet know good from evil, they are not morally culpable for sin. In this light, the idea that infants need baptism to be cleansed from sin seems unnecessary, as they are not yet in a position to be held accountable for wrongdoing.
Furthermore, baptism is often viewed as a means of initiating a personal relationship with God. In the New Testament, baptism is associated with repentance and faith—elements that require understanding and personal decision. In Mark 16:16, Jesus says, “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved.” This makes it clear that baptism is intended for those who are capable of faith and repentance, things that infants are not yet able to do. If children are innocent and unaware of good and evil, they would not yet be in a position to make such a decision, which raises questions about the necessity of baptizing infants.
The example of Jesus in the Gospels also speaks to this point. In Matthew 18:3 and Mark 10:14, Jesus emphasizes the innocence of children and their special place in the kingdom of God. He does not baptize children, nor does He suggest that they require baptism to be saved. Instead, He welcomes them with open arms, highlighting their purity and innocence. If Jesus, who came to bring salvation, did not baptize children, it suggests that their innocence may mean they are already in a state of grace, exempt from the need for baptism in the way that adults are.
When we consider the idea that children are not morally accountable because they do not yet know good and evil, it becomes clear that infant baptism is not biblically necessary. Children, by virtue of their innocence, are not in need of the same kind of redemption that adults are. Baptism, which is meant to cleanse from sin, is not be needed for infants who have not yet reached an age of moral understanding.
The sacraments, as practiced by the Roman Catholic Church, serve no genuine spiritual purpose. Instead, they act as tools to foster dependency on the Church—an institution worth billions of dollars and deeply involved in political affairs. This raises the question: does the Church represent the god of this world or Christ’s kingdom, which is not of this world? It cannot serve both. Rather than guiding individuals into a deeper relationship with God, the sacraments create a system where believers are taught that their spiritual well-being relies solely on the Church and its rituals. These rites do not bring true spiritual transformation or grace but instead reinforce the Church's authority and control over its followers.
Through the sacraments, the Roman Catholic Church establishes a framework that forces believers to continually return to the institution for validation and guidance. This dependency ensures the Church remains central in their lives, preserving its power and influence. Instead of fostering genuine spiritual growth, the sacraments become a means of keeping individuals bound to the institution, preventing them from experiencing a direct, personal relationship with God outside of the Church’s control.
The god of this world has blinded the minds of those who follow this system, keeping them from seeing the truth of the gospel. In their blindness, they remain trapped in the rituals and traditions of man, unable to experience the freedom, grace, and direct relationship with God that Christ offers through His gospel 2 Corinthians 4:4
Do you place your trust in the actual apostles of Christ, the Holy Word they proclaimed, and the truth they delivered, or do you follow a man-made institution that has repeatedly added to the gospel through its own teachings? The Roman Catholic Church, over the centuries, has introduced doctrines and traditions that are not rooted in Scripture but rather in human invention. These additions to the gospel go against the clear warnings of the inspired Word of God, which condemns those who alter the gospel for their own purposes. As Scripture states, "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book: If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book." (Revelation 22:18-19)
The Church’s teachings, often rooted in traditions and practices that are not found in the Bible, have misled many believers into a false sense of security, leading them down a path that ultimately leads to destruction. In following such an institution, individuals place their faith not in the pure and unaltered message of Christ, but in a system that has sought to redefine and distort His teachings. The gospel of Jesus Christ is simple and clear: salvation comes by grace through faith in Christ alone, not through man-made rituals, sacraments, or traditions.
The question remains: will you choose to follow the apostles of Christ, who were sent to proclaim the untainted truth of the gospel, or will you continue to follow an institution that has added to, and at times completely altered, that gospel? The consequences are eternal, as God's Word warns that those who alter the gospel will face severe judgment. It is crucial to return to the foundation of the faith, built on the Word of God, and reject the added traditions of men that can only lead to destruction.
Comments