Today, I’ll be shining a light on the Roman Catholic Church's fondness for sun worship—pun intended. But before we dive into that, let's start with 1 John 2:3-4 (KJV),
"And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him."
Which clearly states that if you don’t keep the commandments of God as they are, you’re nothing but a liar. Now, let’s consider the commandment to honor the Sabbath as a Holy day. Funny thing is, this commandment hasn’t changed. There's absolutely no biblical evidence suggesting otherwise.
Yet, here comes James Cardinal Gibbons in the September 23, 1893 issue of the *Catholic Mirror*, making quite the bold admission. He said, “The Catholic Church, … by virtue of her divine mission, changed the day from Saturday to Sunday.” Well, that’s refreshingly honest! So, by their own admission, the Catholic Church has taken it upon themselves to rewrite the commandments, not once but also by way of the second commandment.
How noble. They just went ahead and declared that the church is above the commandments of God. If we follow the logic from 1 John, that means they’re, well… let’s just say not exactly telling the truth.
And if that wasn't enough to raise an eyebrow, let’s bring in the words of H.F. Thomas, the Chancellor of Cardinal Gibbons. He once stated, "Of course the Catholic Church claims that the change [of the Sabbath] was her act… and the act is a mark of her ecclesiastical authority in religious things."
Oh, so it’s not just a little oversight, but a deliberate move? That’s reassuring. The RCC is openly admitting they’ve taken full credit for this monumental switcheroo. They even consider it a "mark" of their authority. How considerate of them to let us know that when they decide to rewrite the commandments, it’s not a mistake—it’s a feature!
So, when Jesus said, "If ye love me, keep my commandments" (John 14:15), what did He really mean? Apparently, the RCC decided to take that as more of a suggestion than a command. After all, when you've got your own set of rules, who needs to follow the ones given by Christ Himself, right? By showing complete disregard for the original commandments, they seem to be sending a clear message: "We’re not really that into you, Jesus." Which leads us to an intriguing question—if they’re not showing love for Christ by keeping His commandments, who exactly are they worshipping?
To answer that, let’s take a little trip back in time to ancient Rome. Because, as it turns out, when in Rome, do as the pagans do...
When Constantine I, who—no surprise here—was a devoted sun-worshipper of the sun god Baal (and just a friendly reminder, Baal is also Baalzebub, the prince of the power of the air and demon ruler), came to power in 313 AD, he decided to get a bit creative with Christianity. In what can only be described as a stroke of "genius," he legalized Christianity and, in a true nod to his pagan roots, made the first Sunday-keeping law. On March 7, AD 321, he issued a decree that said, "On the venerable day of the sun let the magistrates and people residing in the cities rest, and let all workshops be closed" (Codex Justinianus 3.12.3, trans. Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, 5th ed. (New York, 1902), 3.380, note 1).
So, there you have it—the perfect blend of sun worship and Christianity. Who would’ve thought that the "venerable day of the sun" would end up as the new Sabbath? Well, if you’re merging paganism with Christianity, it makes perfect sense. But let’s be honest, it sounds a bit more like honoring Baal than keeping the commandments of Christ, doesn’t it?
See, the arrogance among the Romans was truly something to behold—they quite literally saw themselves as gods. To boldly declare that the RCC has defied the word of God is, in essence, doing exactly what Satan did: claiming to be above God. I mean, just listen to this quote from the *Catholic Record of London, Ontario* on September 1, 1923: "Sunday is our mark of authority...the church is above the Bible, and this transference of Sabbath observance is proof of that fact." So, in classic Satanic fashion, they openly admit to placing themselves above God's word. Suddenly, it makes perfect sense why they didn't want anyone reading the Bible and why they went so far as to murder those who did during the Inquisition.
Let's take a trip back to the Roman Empire, where the official religion was Mithraism, another name for sun worship—also known as Baal worship. Because, of course, Baal loves to switch up his names to keep people guessing, just like the devil does. The father of lies at it again! To avoid being murdered by these animals—no, not the lions, the ones walking on two legs—early Christians had little choice but to blend in. After all, these chauvinistic "gods" would either throw them to the lions or impale them on poles and burn them alive. Call me naive, but does that sound like something holy, or does it reek of pure, unadulterated Satanism?
Let’s set the record straight on something that’s been circulating for centuries: the claim that Peter, the so-called "first pope," was ever in Rome. Spoiler alert—he wasn’t. Not even close. The idea that Peter was in Rome is as historically grounded as saying the moon is made of cheese.
First off, let's talk about the Bible, you know, that little book the RCC claims to be the ultimate authority on all things spiritual. Nowhere—and I mean *nowhere*—in the New Testament does it say Peter ever set foot in Rome. He was busy spreading the Gospel all over the place—Jerusalem, Antioch, and a few other spots, but Rome? Not a whisper of it. If Peter had been in Rome, you’d think someone would’ve mentioned it, right? Yet, not a single word from Paul, who, by the way, wrote a whole epistle to the Romans and never once gave Peter a shoutout. If Peter had been there, surely Paul would’ve said, “Hey, shoutout to my bro Peter, holding it down in Rome!” But nope, silence.
Now, the church loves to point to some vague, unverified traditions and sketchy writings that surfaced long after Peter’s time. They like to say these support the idea of Peter’s Roman residency. But let’s be real—these sources are about as reliable as a three-dollar bill. In fact, they’re the ancient equivalent of “my friend’s cousin’s barber said...” In other words, hearsay.
And let’s not forget the cherry on top: the timeline. Peter was martyred under Emperor Nero around AD 64. Yet the idea of Peter being the bishop of Rome didn’t even start popping up until *decades* later, when the church needed to solidify its power base. Convenient, eh? The RCC needed a strong foundation, and what better way to cement their authority than to retroactively place their supposed founder, Peter, right there in the heart of the empire? Talk about rewriting history!
So, where does this leave us? The truth is, there’s not a single shred of solid evidence—biblical or historical—that Peter was ever in Rome. The entire premise is built on tradition and legend, not facts. The RCC has propped up this narrative to bolster their claim to power, but when you strip away the myths and look at the evidence, it’s clear: Peter in Rome is just another fairy tale in a long line of RCC fabrications.
Continuing with our exploration of the RCC’s deep ties to ancient pagan worship, it’s impossible not to notice the blatant symbols carried over from Baal (or Baalzebub) sun worship right into the heart of what they now call "Christian" practices. Take a closer look at those so-called "holy" symbols and you’ll start to see the truth. Remember those ancient demi-gods holding crooked staffs? Well, guess what—the pope himself is parading around with that very same staff today. The serpent croziers, which you’ll find right there in his hand, are eerily similar to the symbols of serpent worship and lightning bolts, which were tools of the ancient sun god, Baal.
And it doesn’t stop there. Let’s talk about the pine cone—another emblem that was used to represent the deity of solar gods in Rome. Look around Vatican City, and you’ll see pine cones everywhere. These aren’t random decorations; they’re carryovers from the very sun worship practices the RCC claims to denounce. All those suns plastered all over Catholic churches? They’re not there to symbolize the light of God. They’re honoring the celestial bodies and sun gods associated with Baalzebub, the very essence of Satan himself.
For those of you who missed my last video, let me fill you in on something else that’s been conveniently brushed under the rug: the title "Pontifex Maximus." This wasn’t just any title—it was the name given to the Babylonian high priest who performed sacrifices and offerings to demonic gods, elemental forces that served Baal. And guess who proudly wears that title today? Yep, the pope. He who condemned pagan practices has @Pontifex as his handle on X ! Talk about irony!
And then there’s the whole veneration of saints. The RCC teaches its followers to pray to dead saints to intercede with God on their behalf. But let’s call it what it is—necromancy. The Bible is crystal clear: necromancy is a no-go. Why would anyone talk to dead humans to communicate with a divine spirit? The truth is, these so-called saints were never human to begin with. They are the same demonic forces, lesser gods, spirits, jinns, or genies that have been deceiving humanity for centuries. I know this firsthand—these spirits were sent to my home, through black magic, and tried to claim me, telling me, "You belong to the devil now." To which I responded, "Even the prey of the terrible shall be delivered, now get the f**k out of my home!" That’s the kind of power that comes from knowing the truth and refusing to be deceived.
The connection between ancient demonic worship and modern Catholic practices is undeniable when you know where to look. Don’t be fooled by the robes and rituals—this is nothing more than a continuation of the same old lies, wrapped up in a new package.
Ah, the Vatican and its endless sea of gold. Ever wondered why they have such a fascination with the stuff? It’s not just about flaunting wealth or making sure every inch of the church glitters with opulence. Oh no, it goes deeper—straight back to ancient sun worship. You see, the sun worshippers of old had a rather sparkly belief: gold was the very flesh of their sun god. Yes, that's right, gold was considered divine, the sun's precious, radiant body!
In Babylon, Marduk, the chief sun god, was practically made of gold in their eyes. And the Romans? They were no slouches either. Their sun god, Sol Invictus, had a whole collection of golden paraphernalia. Gold was their way of saying, "Look at us, we're honoring the sun god in style!" It wasn’t just about luxury; it was about making sure their gods felt appreciated—probably because nothing says "divine favor" like a massive gold statue.
Fast forward to the Vatican, and we see that tradition sticking around. The gold in the Vatican isn’t just a show of wealth; it’s like a tribute to the sun gods of yore. The altars, the chalices, the gilded ceilings—they all serve as a sparkling reminder of those ancient pagan practices.
So, while the Church might dress it up as a symbol of divine glory or spiritual splendor, the truth is a bit more... golden. It’s like they’ve kept a bit of that ancient sun worship flair alive, showing that even today, the allure of gold and its divine associations are just too dazzling to ignore. Maybe it’s a subtle nod to those old beliefs, or maybe it’s just that old habits die hard, especially when they involve shiny, precious metals.
Ah, the intriguing correlation between education and religious beliefs! It’s almost like a scene straight out of a historical drama where knowledge and enlightenment step in to challenge long-held traditions. Major cities like Madrid and Barcelona have seen a noticeable shift away from Catholicism, and it’s no coincidence that this change parallels their access to better education. When people have the chance to educate themselves, they start questioning long-standing beliefs and practices, seeing through the layers of ancient dogma.
Contrast this with regions where education remains scarce, and you’ll often find traditional pagan beliefs holding strong. It’s not that the people are inherently more superstitious; it’s that a lack of access to knowledge keeps them tied to outdated practices and beliefs. It’s akin to how Ibn Saud maintained his grip on power in Saudi Arabia. By keeping his people uneducated and oppressed, he ensured that they remained under his control, unaware of the broader world and alternative perspectives.
But let’s not forget the positive side of this narrative. Education brings light, and with it, a greater understanding of true values and beliefs. The true message of Christ—love, compassion, and enlightenment—flourishes in the presence of genuine knowledge and understanding. So, as education spreads and ignorance fades, there’s hope that more people will embrace the true teachings of Christ, free from the shadows of ancient pagan practices and oppressive control.
To underscore the idea that the teachings and practices of the Roman Catholic Church diverge from Biblical teachings and are rooted in deception, consider the following Bible verses:
John 8:32: "And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." This verse emphasizes the importance of adhering to the truth, suggesting that any deviation from Biblical truth could lead to spiritual bondage.
Matthew 15:9: "But in vain they do worship Me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men." Here, Jesus criticizes those who replace God’s commandments with human traditions, which could be seen as a critique of institutions that diverge from Biblical teachings.
2 Corinthians 11:13-15: "For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light (the sun!) Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works." This passage warns about deceitful leaders masquerading as servants of righteousness, which can be interpreted as a warning against false teachings and institutions.
Galatians 1:8: "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." This verse stresses the importance of sticking to the true gospel as preached by the apostles and warns against any deviations.
These passages collectively argue that any teachings or institutions that deviate from the core message of the Bible or introduce practices not found in Scripture should be scrutinized closely.
The Roman Catholic Church has its own anathemas and curses, often seen in the context of its councils and doctrinal definitions. Historically, the Church has declared certain teachings or groups to be "anathema" or "cursed" if they were deemed heretical or contrary to Catholic doctrine.
The Catholic Church, particularly in its historical councils and decrees, has sometimes used similar language to condemn teachings or practices that it views as contrary to its own understanding of the faith. For instance, the Council of Trent (1545-1563) issued anathemas against Protestant reformers and their teachings, declaring them to be accursed.
Now, here’s where it gets interesting. The Catholic Church has had its own flair for dramatic curses throughout history. They’ve used their version of anathemas to label dissenters as accursed, just like Paul did. But let’s be real here—the difference is that while Paul’s curses come from divine authority, the Church’s anathemas often feel a bit more like mortal theatrics. It’s like they’re channeling their inner sorcerer, sprinkling a bit of witchcraft into their doctrinal disputes. After all, God's curses come with a celestial stamp, whereas mortal “curses” might just be the ecclesiastical equivalent of throwing a tantrum.
So, while divine curses have a whole cosmic weight to them, mortal curses often look like a bit of ritualistic showmanship. Let’s just say there’s a big difference between God enforcing cosmic justice and mere mortals pretending to wield divine authority through their own brand of ritualistic offerings, and witchcraft.
It’s the true Sabbath today, a day of rest, so please forgive the more relaxed tone. After all, on a day dedicated to tranquility, why not enjoy a lighter approach?
As we wrap up, remember: It’s all part of the show—a cosmic spectacle where the divine and the theatrical collide. So, as we bask in this day of rest, let’s keep our eyes open and our skepticism sharp. After all, in the grand theater of religion, it’s always worth watching closely for the truth behind the curtain.
Largest pine cone sculpture in the Vatican
Pine cone staff was the symbol of sun (solar) god Osiris in Egypt,
another name for satanic sun god worship.
Babylonian winged god, Tammuz and his pine cone
Here's a head scratcher: If the Catholic Church and the Jewish people are supposedly worshipping the same Abrahamic God, then why all the anti-Semitism within the Church, especially under Pope Pius XI? And why, under Pope Pius XII, did the Vatican seem to act as a concierge service for Nazi war criminals trying to evade justice?
It’s almost as if the Church’s adherence to its so-called divine mission conveniently overlooked the whole “love thy neighbour” part when it came to the Jews. I mean, it’s quite the twist in the story when a religion that professes to follow the God of the Old Testament ends up backing actions that contradict the very essence of that faith. One might wonder if the divine guidance the Church claims to follow has a rather selective memory, especially when it comes to treating people with the love and respect that the Abrahamic God supposedly demands.
On a different note, I just wanted to share a little ditty my husband wrote for me that put the biggest smile on my face today.
But I'm all about the cats, so he wrote me another.
Comments