top of page
Writer's pictureMichelle Hayman

Questioning the Cost of Salvation: The First Pope's Stand Against Tradition & Monetary Exchange

Updated: Oct 8




There is no clear historical evidence to support the claim that Roman Catholic traditions, particularly those emphasized by the Magisterium, directly originated from the apostles themselves. Roman Catholicism’s doctrine, including its emphasis on tradition, was not part of the religious landscape during the Old Testament era. In fact, the Old Testament functioned without any reliance on church traditions or councils such as those later established by the RCC. This notion of "apostolic tradition" became more pronounced with the institutionalization of Christianity in the fourth century when the Church began to merge with political authority, especially following Emperor Constantine's endorsement of Christianity in 313 AD through the Edict of Milan.


The Apostles, as recorded in the New Testament, focused primarily on the teachings of Christ, faith, repentance, and the spread of the Gospel. However, the development of various Catholic traditions, such as the papacy, indulgences, and the veneration of saints, was a gradual process that occurred over centuries, not something directly instituted by the apostles themselves. Even the concept of the Pope’s supremacy as the "Vicar of Christ" wasn't fully solidified until much later, particularly with Pope Gregory VII’s reforms in the 11th century.


The Bible itself contradicts the notion that additional traditions or teachings are needed outside of Scripture. For example, 2 Timothy 3:16-17 states that

“All scripture is given by inspiration of God… that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.”

This emphasizes the sufficiency of the Bible in guiding believers without the need for additional human-instituted traditions. Despite the Catholic Church’s claims of apostolic continuity, the gap between the original apostles’ teachings and later Roman Catholic practices is apparent when examined from a historical and biblical perspective.


In terms of Catholic tradition, many practices — such as transubstantiation, purgatory, or Marian doctrines — evolved over time and became formalized through councils like the Council of Trent (1545-1563) or the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965). Yet, these doctrines lack clear apostolic foundation when considering the New Testament writings.


The practice of water baptism predates Christianity. It was a central part of Jewish purification rituals, particularly in the context of proselyte baptism, where non-Jews converting to Judaism would undergo a ritual cleansing to signify their purification and entry into the faith. John the Baptist, who baptized Jesus, was performing a baptism of repentance for Jews, a practice that was already well established. This indicates that water baptism was not an innovation of the early Christian church but was drawn from pre-existing Jewish customs. While early Christians did practice water baptism (as seen in the Acts of the Apostles), the highly ritualized form it has taken in Catholicism—particularly the idea of baptism as a sacrament necessary for salvation—developed over time, influenced by evolving theological interpretations. Thus, the claim that the exact sacrament as understood today was instituted by the apostles lacks historical support.


The practice of sacrificial offerings of animals was central to the Jewish faith long before Christ. These sacrifices were meant to atone for sin, express gratitude, or fulfill vows, as outlined in the Mosaic law (e.g., Leviticus). The Temple sacrifices were a key part of Jewish worship, and Christ’s death is often understood as the fulfillment of this sacrificial system. The Roman Catholic Church teaches that the Eucharist is a sacrificial offering, a re-presentation of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. While the Last Supper does seem to echo Jewish Passover traditions, the notion that the Eucharist is an ongoing sacrificial offering developed later. This understanding emerged over the centuries, particularly solidified by theologians like Thomas Aquinas in the Middle Ages. Early Christians viewed the Eucharist as a meal of fellowship and remembrance of Christ’s death. The idea of it being a sacrificial act was not universally held in the first few centuries of the church, and it gradually evolved as the church’s theology became more systematized. Therefore, the RCC’s claim that this sacrament is purely apostolic is historically problematic.


The RCC claims that the office of the pope, as the successor of St. Peter, was established by Christ and continued by the apostles. Historically, however, the early church had a collegial form of governance, with no single bishop or leader exercising universal authority over all Christians. The bishop of Rome gradually accumulated more power and authority, particularly after the legalization of Christianity under Constantine in the 4th century.

Early church fathers like Clement of Rome and Ignatius of Antioch refer to bishops but do not outline a clear doctrine of universal papal primacy. The papacy as it exists today, with centralized authority, was a gradual development rather than a structure established by the apostles. The doctrine of papal infallibility, for instance, wasn’t formalized until the First Vatican Council in 1870, indicating a significant evolution of ideas over time.


The veneration of saints and devotion to Mary bear striking similarities to ancient pagan practices, particularly the worship of Roman gods, otherwise known as fallen angels associated with Lucifer. This worship of saints can be likened to the reverence of the Nephilim, who are considered the offspring of these celestial beings. Such parallels raise questions about the origins and motivations behind these practices within the context of the Roman Catholic Church.The practice of building shrines, offering prayers, and seeking intercession from saints can be seen as an adaptation of the Roman practice of honoring household gods or the genius loci (protective spirits). The same protective spirits used today in Santeria, Voodoo, and Lucimi.

Voodoo, Lucumí, and Santería are Afro-Caribbean religions that incorporate rituals akin to witchcraft, often blending indigenous African beliefs with elements of Catholicism. Practitioners invoke spirits and saints for guidance, healing, and protection, drawing parallels between the veneration of saints in Roman Catholicism and the orishas in these traditions. These rituals, serve as a means of connecting with the spiritual realm, where adherents seek to influence their lives and communities through the power of these rituals and beliefs.


The early church did not practice the veneration of saints or Mary in the highly developed form we see today. These practices grew significantly in the 4th century and beyond, as the cult of the martyrs became popular, and devotion to Mary was influenced by theological debates such as the Council of Ephesus in 431, which declared Mary the Theotokos (Mother of God). The Council of Ephesus convened during a period of significant decline for the Roman Empire, and the declaration of Mary as "Theotokos" was intended to bolster the Church's authority during this challenging time. This pattern is echoed in the later developments of doctrines such as the invention of purgatory, the Assumption of Mary, and the concept of her perpetual virginity, all of which emerged as the Catholic Church faced diminishing influence and control. These theological innovations appear to have been strategic efforts to reinforce the Church's standing in society amid changing dynamics.


This demonstrates that these traditions were not apostolic in origin but evolved as Christianity interacted with local cultures and theological developments.

The concept of purgatory, a place of purification before entering heaven, is not explicitly found in Scripture or early apostolic teachings. Its development can be traced to early Christian debates about the afterlife and theological reflections on the nature of sin and penance. By the Middle Ages, the idea of purgatory became formalized in Catholic doctrine, particularly through the influence of theologians like St. Augustine and Gregory the Great. Concepts similar to purgatory existed in various ancient cultures, including the Greco-Roman belief in a liminal state where souls were purified before reaching the afterlife. The Catholic understanding of purgatory was influenced by these broader cultural and philosophical ideas and was not part of the earliest apostolic teaching.


When Jesus spoke about the fulfillment of all things, He consistently referred to Scripture, saying, "It is written," and highlighting the necessity of fulfilling the prophecies within the Old Testament. He never once cited or emphasized extra-biblical traditions or man-made practices as essential for salvation or faith. This is significant because, if tradition were an integral part of God’s plan, Christ would have certainly mentioned it alongside Scripture.


For example, in Luke 24:44, Jesus said, "These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me." This clearly shows His focus on the fulfillment of written Scripture, not tradition.


Furthermore, if tradition were to hold the same weight as Scripture, it would be expected that Christ would have included or affirmed it in His teachings. Yet, He repeatedly rebuked the Pharisees for their reliance on man-made traditions, calling them out in Matthew 15:3 when He said,

"Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?" This highlights that Christ placed the authority of Scripture above human traditions, which the Pharisees wrongly elevated.


If tradition were meant to be an essential aspect of Christian faith and doctrine, it would be an inexplicable omission on Christ’s part not to mention it or to integrate it into His teachings, particularly when He emphasized the fulfillment of all that was written. This raises questions about the necessity of tradition as upheld by institutions like the Roman Catholic Church, especially when it cannot be traced back directly to Christ's words or apostolic teaching in the Bible.


There is no Old Testament Jewish tradition from Moses, David, or Isaiah that was observed in addition to God’s Word, and Paul reaffirms that “all Scripture is given by inspiration of God” (2 Timothy 3:16; 2 Peter 1:20-21). Notably, this assurance is never extended to tradition; in fact, Scripture often portrays tradition negatively. The word "tradition" appears 14 times in the New Testament, with eight of these references (Matthew 15:2, 3, 6; Mark 7:3, 5, 8, 9, 13) casting Jewish traditions in a critical light. Paul himself makes five references to tradition—two of which are clearly derogatory (Colossians 2:8; Galatians 1:14)—highlighting the danger of elevating human traditions over the revealed Word of God.


A particularly important observation is that even Peter, whom the Catholic Church claims as its first pope, spoke against traditions in 1 Peter 1:18.


"Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers."


This verse, spoken by the apostle Peter stands as a powerful rebuke to the practice of exchanging money for spiritual benefits such as indulgences, masses for the dead, and relief from purgatory, as well as for other sacraments like water baptism. According to 1 Peter 1:18, redemption comes not through "corruptible things" like silver and gold (money) but through Christ’s sacrifice alone.

If Peter, regarded as the first pope, explicitly condemned the practice of exchanging money for salvation, it raises significant questions about the Roman Catholic Church's practice of not “officially” charging but requesting “donations, stipends or offerings “ for essential sacraments such as water baptism, Mass, and communion. These charges seem to contradict the foundational teachings of early Christianity, particularly the idea that salvation and spiritual nourishment are gifts from God, not commodities to be bought and sold. Such practices suggest a troubling shift away from the core principles of faith towards a system that can resemble financial exploitation, undermining the very essence of what Peter( the Roman Catholic Church's first pope) stood for in his ministry.

The implication is clear: salvation cannot be purchased or earned by financial means, nor can it be mediated through priestly rituals that require payment of any kind. Yet, throughout history, the Catholic Church institutionalized systems where monetary transactions were tied to spiritual outcomes.This directly contradicts Peter’s statement and the broader biblical teaching that God’s gift of salvation is freely given, not bought.


In essence, Peter’s words expose the theological and moral inconsistency of any system that claims to "redeem" through financial exchange. Practices like stipends, sacramental fees, or paying for masses undermine the sufficiency of Christ’s sacrifice and place the Church in a position of financial exploitation.,especially since the RCC in countries like Spain receives 315 million euros per annum from the government As such, the Roman Catholic Church's insistence on financial transactions for sacraments and spiritual relief contradicts the teachings of its very own "first pope." This verse from Peter cuts to the heart of this issue, showing that the early apostles never taught or practiced anything resembling these monetary-driven religious rituals. Instead, they upheld the simple, free gift of grace through faith in Jesus Christ alone. According to Scripture, redemption comes solely through Christ's sacrifice, not through "corruptible things" like silver and gold, or man-made traditions.


The Bible’s message is clear: salvation is through Christ alone, "not with corruptible things". No act of human payment, ritual, or priestly mediation can add to what Christ has already achieved on the cross. By implying that souls could be redeemed through the payment of indulgences or stipends for masses, the Catholic Church held believers in a system of religious bondage, where their hope for salvation was tied to their financial ability to buy religious services. This contradicts the Gospel's central teaching that faith, not wealth, is the key to salvation.


Moreover, these practices served to maintain the Church's power over the faithful, ensuring a steady flow of wealth and control. By holding the fear of purgatory over the heads of believers and positioning itself as the mediator for escaping such a fate, the Roman Catholic Church exploited spiritual anxieties for financial gain. This practice clearly distorts the message of the Gospel, which teaches freedom in Christ, not subjugation to institutional authority and its traditions.


Ultimately, 1 Peter 1:18 invalidates the idea that earthly wealth or religious transactions can play a role in securing one’s eternal salvation. The pursuit of monetary gain through sacraments like baptism, mass, or indulgences is antithetical to the teachings of Christ and further underscores how far certain Church traditions have strayed from the purity of the Gospel.


I stumbled across this quote from a UK catholic church. This is in itself false.



The seven sacraments as defined by the Roman Catholic Church—such as baptism, the Eucharist, and confession—did not exist in their formalized structures during Jesus’ lifetime. These rituals were developed gradually by the Church over centuries, long after the apostles, through councils and doctrines. The idea that these sacraments were present from the very beginning is a manipulation of historical facts, intended to give the Church more authority by linking its rituals directly to Christ. Catholics must critically reassess these claims, as they are not grounded in the actions of Jesus but rather in evolving ecclesiastical traditions. True spiritual connection with Christ is based on faith, repentance, and grace—not on man-made rituals or payments associated with these sacraments.


Interestingly the NIV quotes 1 Peter 1:18 as


 "For you know that it was not with perishable things such as silver or gold that you were redeemed from the empty way of life handed down to you from your ancestors."


The omission of the word "tradition" in 1 Peter 1:18 in the NIV translation is significant because it shifts the focus away from the critical context of how practices and beliefs may have been passed down. By not explicitly mentioning "tradition," the NIV can imply a more favorable view of the sacramental practices that the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) promotes, such as indulgences and baptism for financial gain. This can create a narrative that aligns with the RCC's teachings, potentially obscuring the original intent of the verse, which warns against relying on the empty ways of life inherited from previous generations, including any traditions that may be contrary to the true message of the Gospel.


So, what about the remaining references? The three passages often cited by the Roman Catholic Church to defend their traditions—1 Corinthians 11:2, 2 Thessalonians 2:15, and 2 Thessalonians 3:6—do not, in fact, support the evolution of Catholic tradition over centuries. Paul was referring to teachings directly delivered by himself and the other apostles, not to the elaborate customs and rituals that later emerged.


The development of many Roman Catholic traditions, including purgatory, indulgences, and veneration of saints, seems more rooted in pagan practices than in apostolic teaching. Unless the Roman Catholic Church can conclusively demonstrate that these traditions were first introduced by the apostles (and not by later church councils or forged documents like the Donation of Constantine), no true biblical support exists for these practices.


Thus, it becomes clear that while the Church emphasizes its so-called "sacred tradition," the Bible itself points to a singular authority—God's Word—casting significant doubt on the validity of many traditions that have accumulated over time. The lack of scriptural evidence for these traditions indicates that they are the product of human invention, not divine revelation.


In examining the differences between the King James Version (KJV) and the New International Version (NIV) translations of verses discussing "traditions," it becomes evident that the NIV subtly reframes some verses to portray tradition in a more positive light, aligning more closely with Roman Catholic teachings. A key example is


2 Thessalonians 2:15, where the KJV states:


"Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle."


This verse in the KJV uses "traditions," implying the teachings that the apostles passed down, but it does not directly support the elaborate traditions that the Roman Catholic Church later developed, such as the doctrine of purgatory, indulgences, or other extra-biblical practices.


However, the NIV translates this verse differently:


"So then, brothers and sisters, stand firm and hold fast to the teachings we passed on to you, whether by word of mouth or by letter."


By translating "traditions" as "teachings," the NIV shifts the focus from the idea of tradition, which could be perceived as man-made and open to interpretation, to the idea of "teachings," a broader and more authoritative concept. This translation downplays the potentially negative connotation of "tradition" as human invention or manipulation, subtly validating Catholic traditions that claim apostolic origin, even though they were not formally established until centuries later.


Many Catholic traditions were formalized long after the apostles, such as the doctrine of purgatory (formally confirmed in the Council of Florence in 1439), and indulgences, which sparked controversy during the Reformation. These practices, which are not explicitly found in Scripture, were developed by the Church over centuries and cannot be traced directly to the apostles.


This discrepancy supports my theory that the NIV is trying to subtly reshape the biblical text to align with the Roman Catholic Church's claim that its traditions are rooted in apostolic authority, despite the lack of historical evidence that many of these practices were part of the early Christian faith. The KJV, on the other hand, is more consistent in distinguishing between apostolic teachings and later traditions that evolved within the Church.


This subtle difference may reflect an intention to harmonize the translation with Catholic doctrine and tradition, even though such traditions often cannot be directly traced back to the apostles or found in early Christian teachings. This contrast between the two translations highlights how translation choices can influence theological interpretation and align with broader religious agendas.


In fact, if we examine several other verses, we can see how the NIV has altered language to align more closely with Babylonian pagan rituals.


In the King James Bible, Mark 7:3 states:


“For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, except they wash their hands oft, eat not, holding the tradition of the elders.”


The New International Version however states:


"The Pharisees and all the Jews do not eat unless they give their hands a ceremonial washing, holding to the tradition of the elders."


The KJB verse emphasizes that the act of washing hands was a matter of cleanliness rather than a ceremonial ritual. The term "ceremonial washing" used in the NIV introduces a connotation of ritualism that is absent in the KJV. This shift not only suggests a connection to Babylonian pagan practices, which emphasized ritualistic cleansings, but also aligns with the Roman Catholic Church's tradition of ritual observance, further reinforcing the idea that these practices may not stem from biblical origins but from external influences. Thus, it raises the question: were these actions merely practical hygiene, or were they part of a ceremonial tradition steeped in pagan roots?


In conclusion, the argument against Roman Catholic traditions being derived from the apostles is supported by scriptural evidence and historical context. Notably, the early church leaders, including Peter, rejected any notion that salvation could be purchased or influenced by monetary exchanges. The New Testament’s references to tradition highlight its often negative connotations, especially concerning practices that deviate from divine revelation. Therefore, the assertion that Catholic traditions stem from apostolic teaching remains unsubstantiated, raising critical questions about their legitimacy and origins within the faith.





Comments


Commenting has been turned off.