When Angels Become Idols: The Catholic Contradiction of Scripture

Michelle Hayman
Jul 24
17 min read

The Roman Catholic Magisterium claims to be divinely inspired; guided, it says, by the same Holy Spirit who inspired the prophets, apostles, and the sacred Scriptures. This assertion is not peripheral to Catholic theology; it is foundational. The authority of the Church’s dogmas, traditions, and catechetical pronouncements rests entirely on the belief that they proceed from the same divine Spirit who authored the Bible. But herein lies a profound and unresolvable contradiction; one that cannot be ignored by any serious thinker.

If the Holy Spirit truly inspired the Scriptures, and if those Scriptures are, as Catholicism itself affirms, the inerrant and sufficient Word of God, then that same Spirit cannot simultaneously authorize teachings that directly oppose what He has already revealed. For a Spirit that contradicts Himself is not holy, but deceptive. A divine voice that speaks both yes and no; first forbidding something and then commanding it; is not divine at all. It is either divided or counterfeit. Yet this is exactly the position the Magisterium adopts: claiming to speak by the Holy Spirit while teaching practices and doctrines that the Holy Spirit, through Scripture, explicitly condemns.

Take, for example, the invocation of angels and saints. Scripture, breathed by the Spirit of God (2 Timothy 3:16), leaves no ambiguity on this matter. Worship, prayer, and supplication belong to God alone. When the apostle John, overwhelmed by angelic glory, falls at an angel’s feet to worship, he is immediately rebuked: “See that you do it not... Worship God” (Revelation 22:9). Likewise, Paul warns against “the worship of angels,” describing it as a deception that draws the believer away from Christ (Colossians 2:18). Nowhere in Scripture do we find the faithful taught or encouraged to pray to angels. Instead, they are consistently depicted as messengers; servants of God who act at His command, not intercessors who respond to ours.

Yet the Catholic Magisterium not only tolerates but encourages the invocation of angels and saints as intercessors. It teaches the faithful to appeal to them, offer prayers to them, and seek their help; functionally establishing a parallel system of spiritual mediators. And all of this, astonishingly, is done under the same banner of divine inspiration. The very Spirit who once said “Worship God alone” is now said to endorse the prayers of the faithful to creatures.

This is more than doctrinal inconsistency; it is spiritual incoherence. It suggests that God speaks with two voices: one in Scripture, and another through the Church. But if those voices disagree, which one is truly from God? If the same Spirit both prohibits and prescribes a practice, then either the Spirit has changed (which would violate His divine nature, Malachi 3:6; James 1:17), or one of the voices is not the Spirit at all. And if it is not the Spirit, then what is it?

The logical consequences are inescapable. Either God is mutable and His Word unreliable; a view that collapses the entire Christian faith; or the Magisterium is in error when it claims divine authority for teachings that oppose Scripture. There is no third option. A house divided against itself cannot stand (Matthew 12:25). If the foundation of Church authority is the Holy Spirit, then that Spirit cannot be used to validate doctrines He has already condemned.

Thus, the contradiction becomes theological rebellion: to claim the Holy Spirit’s authority while overturning the Holy Spirit’s Word is to replace truth with tradition and God’s voice with man’s. It is to cloak disobedience in the language of divine guidance. And ultimately, it is to attribute to the Spirit of Truth what He has not said, while following a spirit He has warned us against.

The Roman Catholic Church cannot have it both ways. Either the Scriptures are the Spirit’s infallible revelation, in which case the Church must submit to them completely; or the Church is the ultimate authority, in which case the Spirit becomes a rhetorical instrument, not the sovereign voice of God. But if the latter, then we are not dealing with divine inspiration, but with theological imposture; an authority that speaks in God’s name while defying His voice.

The question, then, is not whether the Church can speak. It is this: who is speaking through it?

The Roman Catholic Church openly encourages the faithful to pray to angels, teaching that they may be invoked for guidance, protection, and intercession. This includes formal prayers such as the well-known invocation to St. Michael the Archangel, along with the Guardian Angel prayer taught to children from a young age. These practices are not isolated devotions but are built into the liturgy, catechism, and doctrinal tradition of the Church. They are presented as spiritually beneficial and divinely approved, supposedly guided by the Holy Spirit. However, this teaching directly contradicts the Holy Scriptures, which were themselves given by that same Spirit.

In Colossians 2:18, the Apostle Paul explicitly warns against the worship of angels, identifying it as a false humility that detracts from Christ, the true Head. It is not treated as a harmless or peripheral practice, but as a dangerous deviation that disqualifies the believer. Revelation 22:8–9 reinforces this when the Apostle John, overwhelmed by a heavenly vision, falls at the feet of an angel to worship. The angel rebukes him sharply, saying, “You must not do that! I am a fellow servant… Worship God.” Scripture does not merely discourage angelic veneration; it exposes it as spiritual misdirection.

Moreover, the Bible consistently teaches that prayer and intercession are to be directed to God alone. Psalm 65:2 proclaims, “O You who hear prayer, to You shall all flesh come.” Jesus, when instructing His disciples to pray, says, “Pray then like this: Our Father…”; not “pray to angels,” but to God directly. And Paul affirms in 1 Timothy 2:5 that there is one mediator between God and men: Christ Jesus. There is no biblical precedent, command, or example that authorizes prayer to angels. Every recorded instance of prayer in Scripture is directed to God alone, never to a created being, however exalted.

This brings us to the heart of the contradiction. If the Holy Spirit inspired the Scriptures, and if those Scriptures forbid what the Catholic Church teaches, then the Magisterium cannot be speaking by that same Spirit. A Spirit that commands in one breath and contradicts in another is not holy but divided. But God is not divided; He is unchanging, consistent, and true. James 1:17 declares that in Him there is no variation or shadow of turning. Malachi 3:6 states plainly, “I the Lord do not change.” Therefore, either the Spirit of God contradicts Himself; a theological impossibility; or the Church’s claim to speak by that Spirit is false.

The contradiction is not merely academic; it is theological and spiritual. To teach in the name of the Holy Spirit what the Spirit has already denied in Scripture is to substitute human tradition for divine truth. It is to attribute to God what He has not said and to bind the consciences of believers to practices He has not ordained. This is not simply an error; it is a false claim of divine authority. The Catholic Church, in promoting the invocation of angels, speaks not with the voice of God but in defiance of it. If Scripture is the Word of God, then any teaching that departs from it cannot be.

Revelation 22:18–19 (KJV)

“For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book"

The Roman Catholic Church encourages its followers to pray to saints; deceased human beings; believing that these individuals now dwell in God’s presence and are able to intercede on behalf of the living. Yet the Church has no infallible means of knowing whether these individuals are truly in the presence of God or merely presumed to be. While canonization is portrayed as authoritative, it is ultimately based on human investigation, testimony, and signs that are fallible and open to misinterpretation. But Scripture is clear: only God knows the heart (1 Samuel 16:7; Jeremiah 17:10). No institution, no matter how pious or historic, can see into the soul of a person or determine with certainty their eternal standing before God.

This is a serious spiritual risk. By directing prayer to so-called saints, the Catholic faithful are placing their trust in beings they have never known, whose inner lives and final judgment are hidden in the mind of God alone. There is no biblical warrant for praying to them, and no divine guarantee that they are even among the righteous dead. This opens the door not to divine intercession, but potentially to demonic deception.

So by what authority does the Roman Catholic Church presume to canonize anyone as a saint? If its own teachings are condemned by the Holy Spirit through Scripture, how can it claim that its declarations about the eternal state of a soul are divinely ordained? What spiritual legitimacy can there be in pronouncing someone an object of prayer when the very act of praying to the dead is forbidden by the Word of God?

Porphyry warned of this very danger in his critique of theurgy. He observed that many of the spirits invoked through ritual and prayer are not gods or divine beings at all, but elemental spirits; daimones; who dwell in the sublunary realm and are capable of deceit. These beings, he noted, often masquerade as divine, feeding on human dependence, emotion, and illusion. They imitate holy figures, speak grand words, and draw worship to themselves; all while enslaving the soul under the guise of spiritual help. What Porphyry recognized through philosophical reasoning, Scripture confirms through divine revelation: “Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light” (2 Corinthians 11:14).

In light of this, the only safe and God-ordained object of prayer is God Himself. Only He sees the heart, only He hears prayer rightly, and only He has the power to answer without deception. Christ alone is our mediator (1 Timothy 2:5), and through Him alone do we have confident access to the Father (Hebrews 10:19–22). All other spiritual avenues are uncertain at best, and at worst, demonic in origin.

Yet despite these warnings, the Roman Catholic Church not only encourages prayer to saints; it assigns a saint for every day of the year. In some calendars, multiple saints are honored per day. This is not a minor devotional aid; it reflects an entire spiritual system built on constant communication with the dead, most of whom the Church has no sure knowledge of. This turns daily prayer into a daily risk, a repeated act of trust in the unseen realm without the discernment or command of God. It is, in effect, a system vulnerable to spiritual exploitation, disguised as piety.

Rather than praying to these unverified spirits; whose hearts only God knows and whose current state is invisible; we are called to pray to the One who lives, sees, and hears. To seek any other spiritual voice in place of God is to open the soul to illusion, confusion, and potentially demonic influence.

Many spiritual practitioners through the ages have attempted to pray to elemental spirits or angels for guidance and power. However, the Neoplatonic philosopher Porphyry warned that those who think they are communing with benign higher beings may in fact be engaging with deceptive daimones. In his Letter to Anebo, Porphyry noted disturbingly that manifestations at theurgic rites often behave in a deceitful manner: “it is a common thing with the gods and daimones alike, and with all the superior races, to speak boastfully and to project an unreal image into view”, such that the supposed “gods” prove no better than demons. He questioned how any true deity could sometimes bring about evil or harm: “How is it that some of them are givers of good and others bring evil?”. To Porphyry’s mind, a being that boasts, deceives, or causes injury cannot be a genuine god. Thus, praying to ostensibly friendly cosmic powers – whether elemental spirits or angels – risks inviting the same daimones in disguise that delight in misleading their devotees. What presents itself as an angel of light may in reality be a corrupt spirit playing pretend.

1 Timothy 4:1 (KJV)

“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;”

Even Iamblichus, the ardent defender of theurgy, tacitly acknowledged the peril Porphyry pointed out. Replying to Porphyry’s concerns in De Mysteriis, Iamblichus admitted that if the theurgist errs in ritual purity, “the inferior races assume the guise of the more venerable orders, and pretend to be the very ones which they are counterfeiting,” giving “boastful speeches and pretensions of power which they do not possess”. In other words, imposter spirits can show up to the rites, masquerading as gods or angels and delivering grandiose but false revelations. Iamblichus insists a properly trained priest can “detect and reject the misleading assumptions of these pretenders as not being spirits that are good and true”. Yet this admission only underscores Porphyry’s critique: in practice, one who invokes lesser spirits is always in danger of being duped. The line between a “good daemon” and a deceitful one is perilously thin when one ventures into the lower occult realms. Prayers to elemental spirits or angels, if not directed rightly (and Orthodox tradition would say such prayers cannot be rightly directed by human will at all), are effectively an open invitation to fraudulent daimones. The theurgist may think he is compelling a benevolent angel, but according to Porphyry he is far more likely communing with morally ambiguous spirits or outright demons skilled in mimicking divine beings.

Porphyry’s skepticism of theurgy went beyond isolated incidents of trickery – he fundamentally saw the whole enterprise as spiritually suspect. Augustine of Hippo, who had access to Porphyry’s writings, observes that Porphyry ultimately attributed the marvels of theurgy to “deceitful demons” rather than true gods. Porphyry was “surprised” and troubled by reports that Egyptian theurgists could even threaten or coerce so-called gods to do their bidding by magical rites. One such practitioner, the priest Chaeremon, claimed that by uttering certain spells – even blasphemous threats to divulge sacred mysteries or “scatter the limbs of Osiris” – he could compel the celestial gods to obey him. Porphyry rightly found it absurd that any true gods, “those that shine with sidereal light,” would cower like frightened children before a mortal’s commands. The only reasonable explanation, he hinted, is that these apparitions were not truly gods at all but a lower order of spirits susceptible to manipulation. In Porphyry’s analysis, they are “that race of spirits…who simulate gods and dead men…but demons they really are”. What seems like divine communion in theurgy is in fact sorcery over fickle, sub-divine entities. This is a damning indictment: theurgy is not a holy ascent to God, but a kind of occult bargaining with spirits who are themselves bound by passions and deception. Little wonder Porphyry was wary – he concluded that no matter what minor “purgation” of the soul theurgy might offer, “this art can[not] secure to anyone a return to God”. At best it cleanses the lower part of the soul superficially; it does not elevate the mind to the true intelligible God. At worst, it ensnares the practitioner in a web of dependence on unreliable spirit-guides. Porphyry even noted that the “gods” of theurgy, when asked about the highest good or blessedness, gave muddled and unsatisfying answers – so much so that he deemed their revelations “ill-advised” and unworthy of true divinity. Such guides “cannot be either gods or good daimones, but are either that spirit who is called the deceiver, or mere fictions of the imagination”. In effect, the whole theurgic doctrine that one should invoke intermediate spirits for spiritual knowledge is, to Porphyry, a demonic doctrine: a teaching propagated by deceitful powers that leads souls astray and prevents their ascent to the truly divine realm.

From a Christian theological perspective, these warnings resonate strongly. The Bible and the true Church similarly regard the direct worship or invocation of intermediary spirits as spiritually disastrous. The apostle Paul cautioned against anyone who would entice believers into a “worship of angels,” which he saw as incompatible with holding fast to Christ as the Head (Colossians 2:18). In the pastoral epistles we find the prediction that people will fall prey to “seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils” (1 Timothy 4:1) – a fitting description of teachings that encourage reliance on occult intermediaries in place of God. Indeed, a regional church council in Laodicea (4th century) explicitly condemned the practice of invoking angels. This council’s 35th canon decrees that Christians must not forsake God and “go away and invoke angels,” declaring such invocation a “covert idolatry”; anyone caught engaging in it was to be excommunicated “for he has forsaken our Lord Jesus Christ… and has gone over to idolatry”. This stark language reflects the early Church’s view that soliciting help from angels (apart from God’s will) isn’t a mild indiscretion – it is tantamount to turning away from God toward false gods. In other words, it is demonically inspired error to place one’s trust in created spirits rather than in the Creator. Porphyry’s philosophical critique of theurgy and the Christian critique of angel-worship converge on this point: the only safe and true path Godward is to address one’s devotion and petitions to God Himself. Any other spiritual “shortcuts” that call upon cosmic powers are a trap. They may promise knowledge or aid, but they ultimately “seduce and hinder” the soul’s journey toward the True Good. Like Augustine remarked, wonders wrought outside the worship of the one true God are mere “pastime of wicked spirits” meant to ensnare the unwary. Such practices lead not to freedom, but to spiritual bondage under fraudulent beings.

A vivid biblical illustration of the proper order is found in the Book of Daniel. Daniel, a prophet renowned for his piety, certainly benefits from angelic ministry – but crucially, Daniel never prays to the angels themselves. In Daniel chapter 9, he offers a lengthy prayer to God on behalf of his people, and in response God sends the angel Gabriel with an answer “before Daniel had even finished his prayer”. In chapter 10, Daniel is again fasting and praying to God for understanding. After three weeks, an angelic messenger finally reaches him and says, “from the first day that [you] set [your] heart on understanding and on humbling [yourself] before God, [your] words were heard”. That heavenly messenger (often understood to be Gabriel) declares “I have come in response to your words”. Importantly, the “words” Daniel spoke were addressed to God alone. God immediately dispatched an angel to Daniel as soon as he prayed, though in this case the angel’s arrival was delayed by spiritual opposition (hence the three-week wait). When describing this episode, Scripture leaves no room to think Daniel petitioned the angel Michael to save the day. On the contrary, the angel who spoke to Daniel revealed that Michael (the great archangel) came to assist him in battling the demonic “prince of Persia” en route. Michael’s intervention was part of the unseen angelic conflict, not the result of Daniel invoking Michael by name. Daniel’s role was simply to persevere in prayer to God, and the help of both angels was set in motion by God’s initiative in answer to that prayer.

This highlights a profound asymmetry in genuine divine communion: grace and aid descend from God; they are not pulled down by human manipulation. We cannot compel heaven by a formula; we can only supplicate the Most High and trust in His wisdom to send help (whether through an angel or otherwise). As Augustine eloquently explained, even when angels are involved in answering our prayers, “it is He Himself [God] who hears us in them,” and any angelic response “though accomplished in time, [has] been arranged by His eternal appointment”. In other words, angels act as ministers of God’s will, not as independent powers subject to human command. The theurgist’s error is attempting to summon or coerce spiritual beings on his own terms – a presumptuous act that bypasses humble reliance on God. Such attempts invert the proper relationship between human and divine. Instead of the soul submitting to God and receiving divine help as a gift, the would-be theurgist seeks to control the intermediaries through ritual. This inversion is exactly what both Porphyry and the Church find so dangerous. It elevates daimones (or minor “angels”) to the role of spiritual benefactors in place of God, which is why the practice is branded a form of idolatry. And given the propensity of evil spirits to masquerade as angels of light, one who tries to invoke an angel may well get a demon in angel’s clothing. The result is a person entrapped in a demonic doctrine; not one taught by the Holy Spirit, but one explicitly warned about by the Holy Spirit as being the work of seducing spirits. In turning from the truth, they are kept in spiritual bondage and cut off from the liberating power of God’s Word.

Praying to elemental spirits or angels is theologically and spiritually equivalent to dealing with the very demonic powers that Porphyry warned against. It is, in essence, engaging with deceptive daimones under a benign guise. Such practice was rightly seen as a “doctrine of devils” that misleads and enslaves its adherents, because it directs their faith and yearning for the divine toward unworthy, lying spirits. Far from lifting a person upward, this misdirected devotion locks the soul in the sublunar realm of illusion. Porphyry, though no Christian, perceived that these rituals could not unite one with the true One; the supreme God; but only entangled the soul with capricious, morally unstable lower beings who thrived on illusion and manipulation. He rightly discerned that such beings, far from lifting the soul upward, held it captive in the sublunar realm through deception. Yet the "divinely inspired" Roman Catholic Church teaches otherwise, encouraging ritual invocation, prayers to saints, and reliance on spiritual intermediaries whom neither Scripture commands nor God confirms. How, then, can such teaching be from God, when it mirrors the very practices that a pagan philosopher identified as spiritually enslaving—and which the Holy Spirit, through Scripture, repeatedly condemns as the doctrine of devils? Christian theology concurs, urging that we seek the one Mediator and true God, not many mediators. True divine ascent comes by cleaving to God in prayer and purity of heart, not by conjuring spirits. Angels are indeed real and do minister to us – but only at God’s command, not at our beck and call. The Archangel Michael himself, as seen in Daniel, comes to our aid only because God sends him in response to a righteous man’s prayer. Any scheme of theurgy or angel-invocation that claims to force a celestial hand is at best a fraud and at worst a pact with demons. In the end, theurgy is not communion with God at all, but a dangerous diversion: a human attempt to manipulate the lower cosmic powers, which Porphyry believed to be morally dubious and spiritually harmful. The safer and only sure path is the one Daniel and the saints took – prayer directed to the Most High alone, entrusting the soul to God’s care. All true help flows from Him, and any genuine angelic assistance will arrive as His gift, not as a result of our dialing up angels. This is the heart of orthodox theology: “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve.” Every other spiritual overture that bypasses God to seek favor from intermediate beings leads into darkness, not light – a counterfeit roadblock to salvation rather than a bridge to it.

Given all this, how can the Roman Catholic Church truly claim to be divinely inspired when it advocates practices so clearly at odds with the Spirit-inspired Scriptures? The Word of God calls for singular devotion to Him alone, warns against consulting the dead, forbids invoking spiritual intermediaries, and exalts Christ as the sole Mediator between God and man. And yet the Church that claims to speak with divine authority promotes the very opposite: prayers to saints, angelic invocations, and ritual appeals to invisible powers whose origins and moral character are hidden from human discernment. This is not the path shown by Daniel, by the prophets, or by Christ Himself. It is not the example of the apostles, nor is it the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Instead, it mirrors the practices of pagan mysticism and resembles the spiritual bondage Porphyry so clearly warned against.

If the Spirit of God cannot contradict Himself; and Scripture tells us He cannot; then any institution that teaches doctrines contrary to the Spirit’s written Word cannot be speaking by that same Spirit. A church that sanctifies what God forbids, that leads souls to invoke those whom Scripture calls “the dead,” and that lays upon the faithful a system of spiritual dependence on unseen beings, cannot be divinely guided. At best, it is mistaken; at worst, it has given heed to seducing spirits and the doctrines of devils. The test is simple and eternal: to the law and to the testimony; if they speak not according to this Word, it is because there is no light in them (Isaiah 8:20).

Therefore, the Catholic Church’s claim to divine inspiration collapses under the weight of its own contradictions. The Spirit who gave us Scripture cannot also bless its denial. The true Church of God will always lead believers upward to Christ alone, not sideways into the shadows of spiritual intercessors. God has spoken; and He has not stuttered. Let every other voice be tested by His Word.

Sources: