As a Christian, adhering to the teachings of the Gospel is central to my faith. However, when I encountered the Catholic practice of canonizing saints, I began to question its foundation in the Bible. Since coming to Christ and reading the Gospel, I haven’t found any direct mention of a process for declaring individuals as saints. This led me to explore the issue more deeply, asking important questions rather than following teachings without discernment.
Where does this practice come from, and what authority is there for it in the life of the Church? In exploring the history and theology behind the canonization of saints, I aim to reconcile this practice with the biblical teachings I’ve come to know.
I apologize if this offends anyone, but I believe it is our Christian duty to help others recognize and understand falsehoods.
The doctrine claiming that the Pope holds divine authority to canonize saints is rooted in Catholic tradition, and the teaching authority (Magisterium) of the Church. However, this assertion is not without controversy, especially when examined through theological reasoning, Church history, and the nature of divine authority. The argument against this divine authority relies heavily on scripture, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and the historical evolution of the canonization process.
The New Testament does not provide a clear scriptural mandate for any individual, including the Pope, to declare someone a saint. Catholic teaching often refers to the power of the keys given to St. Peter in Matthew 16:19 ("I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven...") as the foundation for papal authority. However, this passage does not specifically mention canonization. Declaring someone a saint implies a recognition of their eternal place in heaven, a realm that belongs to divine authority. The canonization process as it exists today developed long after the time of Christ, without clear biblical precedent. In paragraph 828, the Catechism of the Catholic Church acknowledges that saints serve as models for the faithful but offers no direct support for the divine mandate behind canonization. It emphasizes the Church’s role in recognizing holiness rather than bestowing sainthood, making it clear that the Church's function is to acknowledge what God has already done.
Historically, the process of recognizing saints was decentralized. In the early Church, local bishops or communities would venerate individuals deemed holy, often based on popular acclaim. It wasn’t until the 12th century, under Pope Alexander III, that canonization became an exclusive papal prerogative. If divine authority for canonization had existed from the beginning, we would expect to see it universally practiced, but the historical record suggests otherwise. This shows that canonization evolved as a Church institution rather than as a divinely revealed mandate. The Catholic Encyclopedia even acknowledges that for centuries, the veneration of saints was controlled by local authorities until it was centralized under the Holy See.
The concept of infallibility raises another concern. While the Pope is said to be infallible when proclaiming dogma ex cathedra on matters of faith and morals, canonization does not fall under this definition. Instead, it involves declaring an individual’s sanctity, something that ultimately lies within divine knowledge. Since canonization involves human investigation into a candidate's life and miracles, it relies on fallible human judgment. This reliance on human discernment becomes questionable when we consider that saints were historically declared through local customs and popular opinion without formal processes. Can it now be claimed that canonization is divinely guided when the process has such human roots?
The inconsistency in the canonization process also challenges its supposed divine nature. The criteria for sainthood have varied over the centuries. Requirements for posthumous miracles were formalized later, and early saints were not subject to the same scrutiny as modern candidates. Political and cultural influences have also shaped the canonization process, undermining the notion that it is purely divinely inspired. Joan of Arc’s canonization, influenced by shifting political tides, exemplifies how earthly factors can play a role in these decisions.
Perhaps the most compelling argument against papal canonization is theological: only God knows the true state of a person's soul. While the Church can evaluate external actions, miracles, and testimony, only God has the ultimate knowledge of a person’s heart.
In 1 Samuel 16:7, we are reminded that
“Man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.”
Canonization presumes knowledge of someone’s eternal status—something that lies solely within God’s authority, not human judgment.
The Roman Catholic Church does not have an exact, universally agreed-upon number of saints. Estimates range widely because the Church has canonized many saints over the centuries, and records from earlier periods are incomplete. However, there are several thousand recognized saints. The Roman Martyrology, an official list of saints and martyrs, includes over 10,000 names, though not all of them have been formally canonized through the Church's modern process. Some of these figures come from earlier centuries, when saints were declared by popular devotion or local bishops rather than by the centralized process the Vatican uses today. In modern times, the canonization process involves beatification (a step before sainthood) and rigorous investigation of a candidate's life, including confirmed miracles. Since the papacy of Pope John Paul II, the number of canonizations has increased significantly, and recent popes have canonized hundreds of saints. For example, Pope John Paul II canonized over 480 saints during his pontificate alone. Thus, while there is no precise count, the number of saints recognized by the Church is in the thousands.
When discussing saints, some stories may seem unusual or "absurd" by modern standards. Here are a few examples of saints whose lives or legends might appear extraordinary or strange:
St. Simeon Stylites (Feast: January 5th) is famous for living on top of a pillar for 37 years in Syria. He chose this form of extreme asceticism to avoid worldly distractions and to dedicate his life entirely to prayer and contemplation. The platform on top of the pillar was extremely small, and his choice of lifestyle attracted great attention, with people seeking advice and blessings from him. The idea of living atop a pillar for decades without coming down seems bizarre by modern standards. Yet, St. Simeon became an important figure in the early Church, admired for his spiritual dedication.
St. Christina the Astonishing (Feast: July 24) St. Christina was a 12th-century Belgian saint who experienced a remarkable life filled with extraordinary phenomena. After supposedly dying at a young age, she is said to have miraculously come back to life during her funeral Mass. According to legend, she levitated to the ceiling of the church and later explained that she had been taken to heaven, hell, and purgatory. St. Christina reportedly had aversions to the smell of human sin, which caused her to take extreme measures, such as climbing trees, hiding in ovens, or even swimming in icy rivers to escape people. These behaviors earned her the name "Christina the Astonishing." But according to historical and apocryphal accounts, Simon Magus, a figure often associated with sorcery and magic in the early Christian era, is said to have performed acts that included levitation. Simon Magus is mentioned in the New Testament in Acts 8, where he is described as a sorcerer who amazed people in Samaria with his magic, through demonic powers. His activities were perceived as magical rather than divine.
St. Denis (Feast: October 9) St. Denis was a 3rd-century bishop of Paris and a martyr. According to legend, after being beheaded by Roman authorities, he picked up his severed head and walked several miles while preaching a sermon. The image of a saint carrying his own head while continuing to preach is certainly one of the more fantastic elements in hagiography. St. Denis is known as one of the "cephalophores" (head-carriers), a category of saints with similar stories. Curiously, even John the Baptist, the greatest prophet who lived before Christ, was unable to perform such a feat after his beheading, perhaps because he was infilled by the Holy spirit instead.
St. Joseph of Cupertino (Feast: September 18) St. Joseph of Cupertino was a 17th-century Franciscan friar known for his frequent levitations during prayer and Mass. He reportedly floated off the ground when experiencing intense spiritual ecstasies, to the amazement (and sometimes frustration) of those around him. Levitation and mystical flight are difficult to explain rationally, and his tendency to "fly" out of his cell or church caused problems for his superiors, who transferred him several times. He is now the patron saint of aviators and students (because he also struggled academically).
St. Genesius of Rome (Feast: August 25) St. Genesius was an actor in Rome who, during a performance mocking Christianity, had a conversion experience on stage. In the middle of the play, he realized the truth of the faith he was ridiculing and declared his belief in Christ, leading to his martyrdom. The idea of an actor being converted during a parody performance seems like an improbable story, but it highlights the power of conversion even in unexpected circumstances. St. Genesius is the patron saint of actors and comedians.
St. Drogo (Feast: April 16) St. Drogo, a 12th-century Belgian saint, is known as the patron saint of unattractive people and shepherds. He reportedly had the ability to bilocate (appear in two places at once), but what is most peculiar is that after suffering an illness that disfigured him, he lived in seclusion inside a small cell attached to a church for 40 years. - His extreme self-isolation due to his disfigurement and the stories of bilocation give an unusual and mystical aura to his life.
St. Polycarp (Feast: February 23) Polycarp, a 2nd-century bishop and martyr, is said to have been sentenced to burn at the stake. However, according to tradition, when the flames surrounded him, they miraculously formed a protective arch around his body, failing to harm him. He was eventually killed by a sword. The image of fire refusing to touch someone while they stand in the middle of a burning pyre stretches the boundaries of natural possibility, adding a mystical element to his martyrdom.
Yet, despite their monumental contributions—Moses who freed people from centuries of slavery, Elijah who challenged Baal directly, Isaiah who foretold the coming of the Messiah, Jeremiah who mourned deeply for the repentance of others, and Ezekiel who envisioned the fall of Jerusalem's temple—none of these prophets were canonized as saints.
There are several saints in Catholic tradition who have been symbolically linked to stars or celestial bodies, either through their iconography, legends, or the timing of their feast days. St. Dominic (1170–1221) According to legend, St. Dominic’s mother had a vision of a star shining from her womb before his birth, symbolizing the light he would bring to the world through his preaching. In many depictions, St. Dominic is shown with a star on his forehead, symbolizing divine guidance and enlightenment. He is the founder of the Dominican Order, and the star is often seen as representing the spread of divine truth through his teachings.
The Dominicans played a prominent role in the Inquisition, being deeply involved in investigating, prosecuting, and adjudicating cases of heresy. This involvement granted them significant authority and influence, including the power to interrogate, judge, and sometimes punish those accused of heresy.
During this period, torture was used to extract confessions or information from suspected heretics. The application of torture varied
The Rack: A device that stretched the victim’s body, often causing extreme pain and dislocation of joints.
The Thumbscrew: A device used to crush the thumbs or fingers, causing intense pain.
The Strappado: Involved suspending the victim by their wrists, often tied behind their back, which dislocated shoulders and caused severe pain.
The Iron Maiden: A spiked chamber that the victim was placed inside, with spikes designed to penetrate the body but not necessarily kill immediately.
The Chair of Torture: A chair equipped with spikes or heated surfaces where the victim was strapped in and subjected to pain.
Water Torture: Victims were subjected to simulated drowning by having water poured over a cloth wrapped around their face., but its use by Inquisition officials, including Dominicans, remains a deeply controversial and morally troubling aspect of their history. I believe they now call it waterboarding
Priests and Torture in the Inquisition.
The Inquisition also led to the persecution and execution of many individuals, often based on flimsy evidence or confessions obtained under duress. The participation of Dominicans in these events has drawn significant historical criticism, particularly regarding their role in the suffering of those accused of heresy.
The Church has never issued a formal apology for its actions during the Inquisition, but it has acknowledged its historical mistakes. Personally, I prefer to refer to these actions for what they are, genocide.
St. Jerome (c. 347–420) St. Jerome is sometimes linked to stars because of his work in translating the Bible into Latin (the Vulgate), which is seen as bringing the "light" of divine wisdom to the world. In art, he is occasionally depicted with a star as a symbol of this intellectual and spiritual illumination.
St. Lucy (c. 283–304) Her name, Lucy, comes from the Latin word lux, meaning "light." - St. Lucy is often associated with light and vision. Though not directly connected to stars, her association with light can be symbolically tied to the idea of stars as sources of light in the heavens. In Scandinavian countries, her feast day on December 13th is celebrated with a "Festival of Lights" during the dark winter months. The most controversial aspect of her story is that she is said to have had her eyes gouged out by the Roman authorities.
Our Lady, Star of the Sea. The Virgin Mary is often invoked under the title "Stella Maris," meaning "Star of the Sea." This title has been used for centuries to describe Mary as a guiding star who leads Christians safely to Christ, much like sailors would use stars to navigate the seas. Mary, as the "Star of the Sea," represents hope and spiritual guidance. Numerous churches and religious institutions are named after "Our Lady, Star of the Sea," emphasizing her role as a protector and guide. It is indeed perplexing how the Virgin Mary, revered as the Queen of Heaven, is also invoked under the title "Star of the Sea" (Stella Maris).
The transformation of her image from a heavenly queen to a nautical guide reflects a curious shift in the focus of her veneration, blending her divine status with a maritime symbolism that seems at odds with her celestial exaltation. In ancient Rome, the star most closely associated with the sea was Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky.
In Egyptian mythology, Sirius was closely linked to Isis and her brother Osiris, the sun god, we know him today as Lucifer.
St. Francis of Assisi (1181–1226) St. Francis is deeply associated with the natural world, and in his famous Canticle of the Sun, he praises God through various elements of creation, including "Brother Sun" and "Sister Moon and Stars." This reflects his reverence for all of God’s creation, including celestial bodies.
Here is an analysis of major Christian feasts and their potential connections to celestial events and historical festivals:
Christmas, celebrated on December 25, is near the winter solstice, marking the shortest day of the year and the beginning of lengthening daylight. This timing aligns with various pre-Christian solstice celebrations that symbolized the rebirth of the sun. The choice of this date may have been influenced by the Roman festival of Saturnalia and the birthday of the Sun God, Sol Invictus.
Epiphany on January 6 commemorates the visit of the Magi, who followed a star to find Jesus. This directly ties to celestial imagery, emphasizing the significance of a guiding star. The celebration of the Magi's visit integrates Christian themes with older festivals celebrating divine manifestations and new light.
The Feast of the Presentation, or Candlemas, is observed on February 2, halfway between the winter solstice and the spring equinox. This timing symbolizes the transition from darkness to light and aligns with ancient festivals like the Roman Lupercalia and the Celtic Imbolc, which celebrated the coming of spring.
Easter, with a variable date, is determined by the first Sunday after the first full moon following the vernal equinox. This method of dating connects the feast to lunar and solar cycles. The timing of Easter also coincides with pre-Christian spring festivals, reflecting themes of renewal and resurrection.
The Feast of the Assumption on August 15 falls around the time of the summer harvest. Although it does not have a direct celestial connection, its date may have been influenced by pre-existing harvest festivals and the Roman Vinalia, which celebrated the fruits of the earth.
The Feast of St. Michael and All Angels, celebrated on September 29, is part of the Michaelmas season, marking the beginning of the harvest and the shortening of days. While not directly tied to specific celestial events, this feast was influenced by pre-Christian harvest celebrations and the Roman Vulcanalia.
St. Augustine’s feast on August 28 is near the end of summer, a period of transition in the agricultural calendar. While not directly associated with celestial events, the timing aligns with ancient harvest festivals, reflecting a broader seasonal context. It is striking that even the man who altered God's commandments was canonized as a saint, while the true prophets, whose lives and messages were foundational to faith, were not.
St. John the Baptist’s feast on June 24 coincides with the summer solstice, the longest day of the year. This timing symbolizes light and the gradual decrease in daylight leading up to the winter solstice. The feast aligns with ancient solstice celebrations, such as the Roman Vestalia, honoring the goddess Vesta with fire and light symbolism.
The birth of John the Baptist is documented in the Bible, particularly in the Gospel of Luke. However, historical proof of the exact date of his birth is not available.
Is it just my observation, or does it seem increasingly apparent that there is a connection between assigning historical figures to celestial bodies and their movements? It raises a pressing question: have we been misled for centuries by those who hold religious authority?
Throughout history, many significant figures and events have been linked to celestial phenomena. This practice spans various cultures and religions, from ancient civilizations that aligned their gods (the fallen angels) and rituals with the stars, to modern religious observances that may echo these ancient connections.
It's also worth noting the sheer amount of popes who come from noble families, particularly during the Middle Ages when political and familial connections were pivotal in papal elections.
Pope Gregory VII, born Hildebrand of Sovana, came from a noble Tuscan family.
Pope Leo IX, born Bruno of Egisheim-Dagsburg, was from a noble family in Alsace.
Pope Urban II, born Odo of Châtillon, was from a noble family in France.
Pope Clement VI, born Pierre Roger de Beaufort, hailed from a noble family in the Comté de Foix in France.
Finally, Pope Pius VII, born Barnaba Niccolò Maria Luigi Chiaramonti, came from an old noble family in Italy.
Pope Nicholas III, born Giovanni Gaetano Orsini, came from the influential Orsini family, one of Rome’s most powerful noble families.
Pope Boniface VIII, born Benedetto Caetani, was from a noble family in Italy.
Pope Sixtus IV, born Francesco della Rovere, belonged to a noble family in the Marche region of Italy.
Pope Paul III, born Alessandro Farnese, came from the esteemed Farnese family of Italy. Pope Pius VI, born Giovanni Angelo Braschi, was from the noble Braschi family of Italy.
Pope Gregory XV, born Alessandro Ludovisi, was from the noble Ludovisi family in Italy.
Pope Alexander VI, born Rodrigo Borgia, was from the powerful Borgia family, known for its significant influence in Renaissance Italy.
Pope Urban VIII, born Maffeo Barberini, came from the noble Barberini family in Rome.
Pope Adrian VI, born Adrian Florenszoon Boeyens, came from a noble family in the Netherlands.
Pope Pius IV, born Giovanni Angelo Medici, was another member of the Medici family, which had a notable influence in both politics and the Church.
Pope Sixtus IV, born Francesco della Rovere, was from a noble family in Liguria, Italy.
Pope Julius II, born Giuliano della Rovere, was also from the della Rovere family, which had significant political and ecclesiastical influence.
Pope Gregory XIII, born Ugo Boncompagni, came from a well-established noble family in Bologna.
Pope Benedict XIV, born Prospero Lorenzo Lambertini, was from a noble family in Bologna, and his background in the nobility helped shape his papacy.
Pope Clement VIII, born Ippolito Aldobrandini, was from the Aldobrandini family, which had significant influence in Rome and Italy.
Pope Alexander VI, born Rodrigo Borgia, came from the powerful Borgia family, which had extensive influence in Spain and Italy.
Pope Paul III, born Alessandro Farnese, was from the Farnese family, a prominent noble family in Italy.
Pope Leo X, born Giovanni di Lorenzo de' Medici, was another member of the Medici family, which wielded considerable power in Florence and beyond.
Pope Gregory XI, born Pierre Roger de Beaufort, hailed from the noble Roger family in France, which had considerable influence in the region.
Pope Benedict XI, born Niccolò Boccasini, was from a noble family in the region of Italy. Pope Martin IV, born Simon de Brion, was from the noble Brion family in France, with significant local influence.
Pope Innocent VIII, born Giovanni Battista Cibo, belonged to the Cibo family, a noble family in Italy with substantial influence.
Pope Leo X, born Giovanni di Lorenzo de' Medici, came from the influential Medici family in Florence, known for its considerable political and economic power.
Pope Clement VII, born Giulio de' Medici, was also from the Medici family, which had a significant impact on Renaissance politics and culture.
Pope Paul III, born Alessandro Farnese, belonged to the Farnese family, a noble family in Italy with substantial political influence.
Pope Pius IV, born Gianangelo de' Medici, was another member of the Medici family, reflecting their continued influence in papal elections.
Pope Urban VI, born Bartolomeo Prignano, came from a noble family in Naples, which had significant regional power.
Pope Gregory XII, born Angelo Correr, belonged to the Correr family, a noble Venetian family with significant influence in the region.
Pope Benedict VIII, born John of Crescenzi, was a member of the Crescenzi family, an influential Roman noble family.
Pope Boniface VIII, born Benedetto Caetani, was from the Caetani family, a prominent noble family in Italy.
Pope Honorius IV, born Giacomo Savelli, came from the Savelli family, a notable Roman noble family.
Pope Martin IV, born Simon de Brion, was from the noble Brion family in France.
Pope Adrian VI, born Adrian Florenszoon Boeyens, was of noble Dutch origin. His family, though not aristocratic by title, had significant social standing in their region.
Pope Gregory X, born Teobaldo Visconti, was a member of the influential Visconti family of Milan, which held significant political power.
Pope Leo IX, born Bruno of Egisheim-Dagsburg, belonged to the noble Egisheim-Dagsburg family in Alsace, which held substantial influence in the region.
Pope Urban VI, born Bartolomeo Prignano, was from a noble family in Naples, which had significant social and political connections.
Pope Paul III, born Alessandro Farnese, was from the Farnese family, one of the most powerful noble families in Italy during the Renaissance.
Pope Innocent VIII, born Giovanni Battista Cibo, was from the Cibo family, a prominent noble family in Italy.
Apologies if I’m mistaken, but is anyone else starting to notice a troubling pattern? Jesus taught that "the love of money is the root of all evil," so why do so many popes throughout history, who came from powerful and wealthy noble families, seem to be granted divine authority? These influential families, steeped in wealth and power, have often held significant sway over the Church’s decisions and direction.
Historically, it was thought that the Pharaohs of ancient Egypt were descended from the Nephilim, which led them to view themselves as divine beings with a direct link to the fallen angels. In a similar vein, the accumulation of papal authority within the hands of wealthy and influential families prompts questions about the alignment between divine will and worldly power.
They also enslaved humanity!
Are we to accept that these noble families, driven by wealth and influence, have been entrusted with the role of representing God on earth? Could it be that they are pursuing their own agendas, possibly seeking world domination, while misleading true followers of Christ? It’s a concern worth exploring, especially when considering the potential for such influential families to shape and distort religious practice for their own ends.
Several noble families who held papal office have been notably involved in financing or influencing wars. The Medici family, for example, produced several popes, including Leo X and Clement VII. Their extensive banking interests through the Medici Bank gave them significant financial clout, allowing them to play a major role in the politics and wars of Renaissance Italy. Similarly, the Borgia family, with Rodrigo Borgia becoming Pope Alexander VI, was infamous for their involvement in political intrigue and warfare. The Borgias used their papal influence to secure and control territories in Italy.
The Farnese family, which produced Pope Paul III, was also deeply engaged in the political and military affairs of the era. They utilized their position and wealth to influence wars and conflicts. The Orsini family, another powerful noble house in Rome, was involved in numerous conflicts and power struggles within the city and beyond. Their significant influence in Rome allowed them to play a considerable role in both local and broader Italian politics. These families used their resources and power to support or finance military endeavors, often to advance their own political and territorial ambitions.
Its interesting to note the noble families who held papal office, such as the Medici, Borgia, Farnese, and Orsini, have some notable connections. The Medici family, for example, was one of the most influential banking families in Renaissance Europe, and their financial empire set a precedent for later banking dynasties. They played a significant role in shaping the development of modern financial systems.
There are notable connections between European banking dynasties and political figures, including prime ministers and presidents, both historically and in contemporary times.
Historically, families such as the Rothschilds had significant interactions with political leaders. The Rothschild family, known for its financial influence in Europe, played a key role in various political events in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Nathan Mayer Rothschild, for instance, had close ties with British political figures and was influential in financing government efforts during the Napoleonic Wars. Similarly, the Medici family, during the Renaissance, used their banking success to gain political power, holding offices and influencing leaders including popes and kings.
In more recent times, influential banking families have maintained connections with high-profile politicians. The Rothschilds, for example, have been linked to numerous political figures through both personal relationships and financial dealings, advising governments on economic matters. J.P. Morgan and his banking firm had substantial influence over American politics and economics, interacting with several U.S. presidents. J.P. Morgan himself was involved in political discussions and negotiations. Additionally, the Rockefeller family, particularly through John D. Rockefeller Jr. and his descendants, has had notable interactions with U.S. presidents and political figures. Nelson Rockefeller, a family member, served as Vice President under Gerald Ford and was involved in political and philanthropic activities.
David Rockefeller, another prominent member of the Rockefeller family, had connections with numerous world leaders, including U.S. presidents and European royals. His involvement in organizations like the Trilateral Commission illustrates the influence of banking dynasties in political and economic spheres. While direct familial ties between banking dynasties and political office are rare, these families often have strong connections with political figures through marriage, business dealings, and social networks.
Statue of Prometheus at Rockerfeller Center.
Prometheus who brought fire down from heaven, akin to Lucifer the morning star (stars are sun, hence made of fire) was cast down from heaven. Prometheus is a Demi-god, offspring of the fallen angels.
At Christmas, they often decorate with a large Christmas tree, which symbolizes rebirth—traditionally associated with the resurrection of Osiris from the underworld, another alias for Lucifer
So I guess we now know who owns the military industrial complex, so much for being free in a democracy, why? Read on.
The Rothschild family, which emerged as a prominent banking dynasty in the late 18th century built upon the financial foundations laid by earlier families like the Medici. The Rothschilds became one of the most influential banking families in Europe.
Similarly, the Rockefeller family, founded by John D. Rockefeller in the late 19th century, and the J.P. Morgan family, led by J.P. Morgan and his successors, gained significant influence in banking and industry in the United States. Their wealth and impact developed in a different era and context compared to the European noble families of the Renaissance.
The Rothschild family has been involved in various health-related initiatives through their investments and philanthropic activities. They have supported medical research and institutions, funding different health and medical projects,
The Rockefeller family has a long history of involvement in public health. Through the Rockefeller Foundation, they played a significant role in developing and distributing vaccines in the early 20th century, including for diseases such as yellow fever and polio. The Rockefeller family has also been influential in the field of genetics through the Rockefeller University, which was established with their funds. The university has been at the forefront of biological and medical research, including notable advancements in genetics.
Several of these prominent families are linked to major financial and philanthropic institutions and have been involved in supporting the development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.
The Rockefeller Foundation has played a significant role in global health initiatives, including efforts related to COVID-19. They have supported various projects aimed at addressing the pandemic, including research, equitable distribution of vaccines, and public health initiatives.
The Rothschild family, known for their significant financial influence, had an indirect connection to the COVID-19 vaccine development through their investments and financial ventures. They have historically held stakes in major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, some of which were involved in the research and development of vaccines.
Additionally, Rothschild financial institutions have been engaged in raising capital and providing financial services to firms working on health-related projects, including vaccines. Their investment in biotech ventures and startups, which may include companies developing COVID-19 treatments and vaccines, further underscores their indirect involvement. Although the Rothschilds themselves were not directly responsible for vaccine development, their financial influence in the pharmaceutical sector contributed to the broader ecosystem in which these vaccines were created.
J.P. Morgan & Co., through its financial arm J.P. Morgan Chase, has been involved in supporting companies and institutions working on COVID-19 "solutions". This includes investment in biotech firms and partnerships that are crucial for vaccine distribution and public health measures.
The profits from COVID-19 vaccines have been substantial, with several pharmaceutical companies reporting significant earnings. Here’s a broad overview of the profits made:
Pfizer-BioNTech: Pfizer reported $37 billion in revenue from its COVID-19 vaccine in 2021 alone. The vaccine has continued to generate significant revenue since then.
Moderna: Moderna earned approximately $18.5 billion in revenue from its COVID-19 vaccine in 2021. The company has continued to see profits from its vaccine in subsequent years.
AstraZeneca: AstraZeneca, which provided its vaccine at cost during the pandemic, reported lower profits from its COVID-19 vaccine compared to Pfizer and Moderna. However, it still saw significant revenue from the vaccine.
Johnson & Johnson: Johnson & Johnson also generated substantial revenue from its COVID-19 vaccine, though exact figures vary and are part of its overall earnings from vaccines and other products.
In summary, influential banking families with significant power and wealth are deeply intertwined with a range of critical sectors, including the Roman Catholic Church, vaccine development, genetics, media and the oil industry. These families, such as the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and Morgans, exert considerable influence over global financial and political landscapes.
Their connections with the Roman Catholic Church are notable, as many of these families have historically been involved in financing and supporting Church activities. This relationship often includes substantial donations and philanthropic efforts, reinforcing their presence within the Church’s sphere of influence.
In the realm of vaccines and public health, these families have been instrumental in funding and supporting research and development. Their investments in biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies have played a crucial role in advancing medical innovations, including vaccines.
The involvement in genetics reflects their broader engagement in cutting-edge science and technology. Through investments in genetic research and biotechnology firms, these families contribute to advancements that shape the future of medicine and human health.
Or eradicating our DNA?
Prominent banking dynasties and wealthy families have also had significant involvement in the media sector. The Rothschild family has historically invested in various industries, including media, though their direct involvement has varied over time. They have held stakes in newspapers and media companies in the past, reflecting their broader investment portfolio.
The Rockefeller family also has a notable history of involvement in media. Through the Rockefeller Foundation, they have funded various media-related projects and initiatives. Their influence extends into broadcasting and publishing sectors through multiple investments and initiatives.
The Morgan family's influence on media comes from their historical investments, with J.P. Morgan's legacy including funding and supporting media ventures. This has included significant investments in newspapers and broadcasting companies.
Additionally, the Murdoch family, led by Rupert Murdoch, is well-known for its extensive media empire. The family's holdings include major global media outlets such as News Corporation and Fox News, showcasing their substantial influence over media narratives and public opinion.
Its worth mentioning again that the New International Version (NIV) of the Bible is published by Zondervan, which is a Christian media and publishing company. Zondervan is owned by HarperCollins, a major publishing company that is part of News Corp, which Rupert Murdoch founded. In addition to his media influence, Murdoch has also received significant recognition from the Catholic Church. He was honored with a papal knighthood by Pope John Paul II. Pope John Paul II's papacy has been controversial, with accusations that he was involved in covering up cases of sexual abuse by priests and allegedly mishandling the disappearance of an Italian schoolgirl. These issues have cast a shadow over the legacy of his papacy, even as Murdoch’s connections to the Catholic Church remain a notable aspect of his biography.
The Rothschild family has invested in various technology ventures over the years. They have a history of investing in innovative technologies and startups through various funds and investment vehicles.
The Rockefeller family has also shown interest in technology. Their investments have included funding for technology research and development through various foundations and trusts.
The Morgan family, specifically J.P. Morgan, has been involved in technology through investments in early technology companies and startups. J.P. Morgan’s historical role in financing and investing has extended into the tech sector, including telecommunications and information technology.
The Gates family, through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, is heavily involved in technology, particularly in global health and education technology. The Gates Foundation has funded numerous tech-based initiatives aimed at improving health and education worldwide.
The Rockefeller Foundation played a significant role in the early development of global health initiatives, including efforts that contributed to the formation of the World Health Organization (WHO). In the early 20th century, the Rockefeller Foundation was influential in public health and medical research, funding various programs and supporting global health efforts.
The Foundation's support for health initiatives helped lay the groundwork for international cooperation on health issues. While the Rockefeller Foundation was not directly responsible for founding the WHO, its work in global health and its promotion of public health standards contributed to the broader movement towards establishing an international health organization, which eventually became the WHO in 1948.
Interestingly, the latest COVID-19 variant is making headlines across media and social platforms, many of which are under the control of major corporations owned by rich banking families. These entities might have a financial interest in both the development of the disease and the investment in vaccines, potentially increasing their wealth. This wealth can, in turn, support the military-industrial complex and perpetuate their influence. Meanwhile, there are theories suggesting that such dynamics could be part of a broader agenda that influences global power structures, while eradicating a certain gene pool.
Have we found the bloodline?
"Get out of her my people" Revelation 18:4
The Medici family, along with other prominent Renaissance families such as the Bardi, Tornabuoni, and Borgia, played a central role in politics, art, and culture.
Cosimo de' Medici, the founder of the Medici dynasty's political power, is known for his patronage of the arts and sciences, including support for Neoplatonism, a philosophical movement that incorporated mystical and esoteric elements. He helped establish the Platonic Academy in Florence, where figures like Marsilio Ficino translated and discussed the works of Hermes Trismegistus, a central figure in Hermeticism, which combined alchemy, astrology, and theosophy.
Lorenzo de' Medici, or Lorenzo the Magnificent, was another Medici deeply invested in the arts and philosophy. His court attracted intellectuals like Ficino, who engaged in astrology and mysticism. Lorenzo himself consulted astrological guidance throughout his rule. Another notable figure linked to the Medici, Pico della Mirandola, attempted to unify branches of magic, astrology, and religion, including Kabbalistic thought, further blending the line between intellectual curiosity and esoteric knowledge.
Catherine de' Medici, queen consort of France, had a more controversial relationship with the occult. She was known to consult astrologers and seers, including Nostradamus, and her reliance on astrology in political decisions led to rumors of her involvement in darker occult practices. Although these claims may have been exaggerated, Catherine's interest in the mystical fueled her legend, especially as political enemies sought to discredit her.
The Borgia family, particularly Pope Alexander VI, faced similar rumors regarding occult practices, largely due to their scandalous reputation. Alexander VI was infamous for his corruption and alleged involvement in crimes such as poisoning, which fueled accusations of witchcraft.
Other families like the Farnese, Orsini, and Colonna were also tied to occult knowledge,
It's important to note that the Medici family produced 3 Popes.
The question that arises is: What is a family with ties to occult practices doing within a church that claims to worship Christ, especially when the occult, associated with demonic influences, is believed to have been introduced to humanity by fallen angels?
Comments