Is the Roman Church Worshipping Mithra, Not Christ?
Many people assume that the Roman Catholic Church is the continuation of Christ’s true teachings, but when we dig into history, an unsettling picture emerges—one that suggests the influence of an ancient mystery religion: Mithraism. This was the dominant pagan cult throughout the Roman Empire, rooted in Persian traditions, and deeply connected to astrology, astronomy, secret initiations, and military conquest.
The Mystery Religion of Babylon: Still Alive Today?
Mithraism can be traced back to Persia, where Mitra (or Mithra) was a god associated with covenants and oaths—the very meaning of the name "Mitra" has been interpreted as "that which binds."It's important to note that the pope and the Roman Catholic Church interpret the biblical phrase "whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven" (Matthew 16:19) as a key part of the papal authority and the Church's power to forgive sins, make doctrinal decisions, and administer discipline within the Church.
The interpretation of the power to bind and loose has been a point of significant debate and controversy, especially when viewed in the broader biblical and historical context. Some critics argue that the Roman Catholic Church places undue emphasis on the pope's authority, interpreting these phrases to elevate the pope's position to an extent that goes beyond what Jesus intended.
We also have the pope's "mitre" regarding the "mitra" (or "mitre") the ceremonial headdress worn by bishops and the pope, and it carries significant symbolic meaning.
Archbishop José Serofia Palma, wearing the mitre. Is a Filipino prelate and a professed member of the Dominican Order. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Cebu - Own work
It is often interpreted as representing the authority and dignity of the office of the bishop, particularly within the Roman Catholic tradition. The word "mitra" has ancient roots, with some scholars suggesting it derives from the Greek word "mýtra," meaning "headband" or "head covering." Historically, the mitra was worn by priests in various ancient cultures, including the Persian religion. In that context, it symbolized power, authority, and divine appointment.
This could suggest an intriguing link between the mitra and the idea of "binding." In theological terms, the concept of "binding" denotes the exertion of control or dominion, and it aligns with the symbolic role of the mitra as an emblem of the bishop's authority. When the pope wears the mitre, it is often seen as a visual representation of his spiritual authority and responsibility. The mitre may, therefore, be symbolically linked to the concept of binding, as it signifies the pope’s role as the spiritual "binder" in matters of faith and discipline, acting on behalf of the Church to uphold God’s will on earth.
In the book of Daniel, we encounter a powerful and intriguing narrative involving the "Prince of Persia," which represents a demonic force opposing God's will. This story takes place in Daniel chapter 10, where the prophet Daniel is praying for understanding and guidance from God. After fasting and praying for three weeks, Daniel is visited by an angelic messenger who reveals that his prayer was heard from the very first day. However, the angel was delayed in delivering the message because of a spiritual battle.
The angel explains that he was confronted by a powerful spiritual entity known as the "Prince of the Kingdom of Persia." This demonic being resisted the angel’s efforts to bring the message to Daniel. The angel further explains that it took him 21 days to reach Daniel because he was opposed by this prince, a force representing the spiritual stronghold over the Persian empire. The battle persisted until the archangel Michael, who is described as one of the chief princes, came to help and freed the angel so that he could deliver God's message to Daniel.
This event demonstrates the reality of spiritual warfare that takes place in the heavenly realms, beyond what is visible to human eyes. The Prince of Persia is not a human ruler but a demonic force, a spiritual power assigned to influence the Persian Empire, obstructing God's messenger and the fulfillment of His will. This confrontation highlights that there are powerful spiritual beings at work behind earthly kingdoms and events, influencing not only rulers and nations but also the course of history itself.
Just as the Prince of Persia opposed the angel delivering God’s message, there are forces in the spiritual realm that actively oppose God's plans for the world, working through ideologies, powers, and rulers that align with darkness. In a broader context, this account reflects the ongoing spiritual struggle between good and evil, and the ultimate triumph of God's power over all other forces.
In the New Testament, Paul also speaks of these spiritual forces in his letters. In Ephesians 6:12, he writes, "For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against rulers, against authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places." This echoes the story in Daniel and reinforces the reality of spiritual warfare that believers must be aware of and prepared to engage in through prayer, faith, and the armor of God.
Despite its Eastern origins, Mithraism spread like wildfire across the Roman Empire, particularly among soldiers, rulers, and elites. Mithraic temples, or mithraea, were found in nearly every major military outpost of Rome. This alone suggests that Mithra was a god of war, an entity invoked in battle. This raises a critical question:
When Constantine—the Roman Emperor who supposedly converted to Christianity—claimed to have seen a celestial sign in the sky with the phrase “In this sign, conquer”, was it truly Christ showing him the way, or was it Mithra, the war god?
It is interesting to note that Emperor Constantine referred to Christ as the "Unconquered Sun" (Latin: Sol Invictus). This phrase was not only a title with deep theological implications but also a reflection of Constantine’s efforts to unify the Roman Empire under a single religious and political vision. The "Unconquered Sun" was a title originally associated with the Roman sun god, Sol Invictus (Mithra) who was celebrated as an eternal, undefeated force. By adopting this title for Christ, Constantine sought to align Christianity with the established Roman sun worship, which had been prominent during his reign.
Mithra: The Unconquered Sun and the Celestial Mover
Mithras was commonly known as Sol Invictus—the Unconquered Sun. His influence wasn't just limited to warfare; he was believed to control celestial movements, life on earth, and even human fate. This is where Mithraism and the Greco-Roman obsession with astrology and astronomy come into play.
During the Greco-Roman period, the heavens were seen as divine. The stars and planets were considered gods themselves, influencing everything from political affairs to personal destiny. Mithra, being a celestial deity, was believed to rule over these cosmic forces, making him a powerful figure in the spiritual realm. The Bible has a name for such a being—"the god of this world" (2 Corinthians 4:4)—a title that many associate with Satan himself.
Could it be that the Roman Catholic Church, which emerged from Constantine’s rule, is not the Church of Christ at all, but a continuation of Mithraic worship disguised as Christianity?
These connections are not mere coincidences—they are worth investigating. And when we look deeper, even more unsettling parallels emerge…
The Secret Initiations: Sorcery, Deception, and the Worship of the Created Over the Creator
The cult of Mithras was not a simple religion—it was a mystery religion, meaning that only those who were initiated into its hidden rites could progress through its ranks. Initiation into Mithraism involved a seven-step process, each step granting the initiate access to secret knowledge, which closely mirrors what we see in the Garden of Eden.
In Genesis, the serpent (Satan) tempted Eve with forbidden wisdom, promising that she would "be like God" if she ate from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. This same deception is at the heart of mystery religions: the belief that through secret knowledge, one can attain divine power and control fate itself. But the Bible warns us about this:
"For by thy sorceries were all nations deceived." – Revelation 18:23 (KJV)
Mithraism was steeped in sympathetic magic—rituals performed with the belief that they could manipulate reality and the natural order. This is eerily similar to what modern occult practices teach, and yet, we see parallels of these traditions within the Roman Catholic Church’s elaborate ceremonies, symbols, and hidden doctrines.
Romans 1:25 also issues a direct warning:
"Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever." – Romans 1:25 (KJV)
The Bible warns us not to worship the sun, moon, and stars—and yet, this is exactly what the worshipers of Mithra, the Unconquered Sun, have always done. From astrology to planetary alignments, the Mithraic cult saw the cosmos as divine, and at the highest levels of their system stood a leader known as the PATER, or Father.
Jesus Christ Himself gave a clear command:
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." – Matthew 23:9 (KJV)
Yet in the Mithraic system, the highest rank an initiate could attain was that of PATER, or "Father." This title was reserved for the most disciplined and knowledgeable initiates—those who were fully indoctrinated into the mysteries of the religion.
Does this sound familiar? It should.
The Roman Catholic Church directly contradicts Jesus’ teaching by insisting that priests be called “Father,” with the Pope himself being addressed as the “Holy Father.” Given the historical prevalence of Mithraism within the Roman Empire, is it really so far-fetched to suggest that the hierarchical structure of the RCC isn’t based on Christ at all, but on the secret cult of Mithra?
The "Birth" of the Sun God – December 25th?
Mithras, the Unconquered Sun, was said to be “born” around December 23rd, during the winter solstice—a time when the Romans celebrated Saturnalia, a festival of drinking, feasting, and debauchery.
The Bible makes no mention of Jesus being born on December 25th, yet this date was officially adopted by the Roman Church.
This is no small coincidence. The birth of Mithras and the celebration of the sun’s return in the sky were deeply embedded in Roman tradition. When Constantine supposedly “converted” to Christianity, is it possible that he simply absorbed Mithraic traditions and rebranded them under the name of Christ?
The Phrygian Cap and the Papal Tiara – Symbols of Mithraic Rule
One of the most recognizable symbols of Mithraic initiation was the Phrygian cap, worn by the highest-ranking members of the cult. Strangely, this cap bears a striking resemblance to the old papal tiara—a headpiece once worn by popes but now mysteriously abandoned.
Why the sudden change? Could it be that as historical scrutiny increased, the RCC sought to distance itself from the obvious connection between the Pope and Mithraism?
At the core of Mithraic belief was the idea that salvation came through the secret knowledge imparted by their god. This belief is identical to what occult traditions have taught throughout history—whether it be Gnosticism, Rosicrucian, Kabbalah, Freemasonry, or other secret societies.
True Christianity, however, rejects this concept completely. Salvation is not found in hidden rituals or special ranks but through faith in Jesus Christ alone.
Yet the Roman Catholic Church thrives on esoteric teachings, priestly intercession, and complex doctrines that keep the masses dependent on their system. This is not Christianity; this is Mystery Babylon in disguise.
Is Roman Catholicism Rooted in Mithraic Worship? A Look at the Evidence
The fact that Mithraic temples (Mithraeums) were predominantly found in Roman military outposts supports the idea that Mithras was revered as a warrior deity. This directly correlates with Constantine’s battlefield vision of the Chi-Rho (☧) and the phrase “In this sign, you will conquer.” Many have speculated that this vision was not from the God of the Bible but rather an adaptation—or even a repackaging—of Mithraic solar worship into Christianity.
The Chi-Rho symbol itself bears a striking resemblance to solar motifs seen in Mithraic depictions. Though Constantine officially converted to Christianity, he continued to venerate the sun, instituting Sunday worship in 321 AD, aligning the Christian Sabbath with the day of the sun. The true Sabbath, which falls on Saturday, was never abolished. In fact, as the Bible shows, Christ rose on the Sabbath. In Matthew 28:1-2, it states, "In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre. And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it." The fact that the sepulchre was empty when Mary arrived shows that Christ had already risen on the Sabbath, validating the significance of the Sabbath as the day of God's covenant with mankind, which was never meant to be erased.
Many elements of Roman Catholicism bear striking resemblances to Mithraic rituals. The hierarchical priesthood in Mithraism, with its ranking system and the title of “Father” for its priests, is similar to the Catholic clergy. The ritualistic meal in which Mithraic followers partook in sacred bread and wine mirrors the Eucharist. Even the date of December 25th, originally celebrated as the birth of Mithras, was later repurposed as Christ’s nativity.
It is not far-fetched to suggest that Constantine’s version of Christianity was a fusion of Mithraic solar worship and certain biblical elements, forming the foundation of the Roman Catholic Church. Instead of true faith in Christ, what emerged was a hybrid religion—a deceptive counterfeit that masks pagan sun worship under Christian terminology.
Mithraism, like the ancient Babylonian mystery religions, was an esoteric, initiatory faith where only those who underwent secret rites were given access to the deeper "truths." This aligns with what the Bible consistently warns against—the secretive, deceptive Mystery Babylon religion that has persisted throughout history under different names and forms.
The mystery religion of Babylon, originating from Nimrod and Semiramis, spread throughout different empires, adapting to new cultures while keeping the same hidden, occultic structure. After Babylon fell, these mysteries were absorbed by Persia, where Mithraism flourished, then Greece, and ultimately Rome. The Roman Catholic Church then absorbed and repackaged these Babylonian mysteries under a Christian veneer, maintaining the same core elements.
Secret priesthoods and hierarchical structures existed in Babylon with the Magian priests, in Persia with Mithraic Fathers, and in Rome with the Catholic clergy. Sun worship was disguised as Christianity, with halos around saints and Christ mirroring solar imagery from Mithraic and Babylonian artwork. The Queen of Heaven concept, which originated with Semiramis in Babylon, later transformed into Isis in Egypt and Mary in Catholicism. Ritualistic meals and sacrifices were present in Mithraism with the sacred meal of bread and wine, which continued in the Roman Catholic Eucharist, claiming it to be the literal body of Christ.
Revelation 17:5 explicitly names "Mystery, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth." This is not just a reference to an ancient city but to a spiritual system—a corrupt religious order that has enslaved people through deception, rituals, and false authority for centuries.
2 Peter 2:3 warns, "And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." This is exactly what the Roman Catholic Church has done, selling indulgences, prayers for the dead, and sacraments, just like the pagan priesthoods of old.
Constantine’s fusion of Mithraism and Christianity was a political move, not a genuine conversion. His vision and the Chi-Rho symbol align more with Mithraic and solar worship than biblical faith. By establishing Roman Catholicism as the state religion, he embedded pagan mysteries within it, ensuring the continuation of the Babylonian priesthood under a new name. This makes the Roman Catholic Church the final form of Mystery Babylon—a deceptive religious system that claims to be Christian but is actually an extension of the ancient Babylonian mysteries, still worshiping the sun, false gods, and demonic entities under different names.
The Taurobolium, the Mithraic initiation rite where initiates were bathed in the blood of a bull, is strikingly similar to later Catholic rituals, particularly the "Anima Christi" prayer by Ignatius of Loyola where he asks to be washed in Christ’s blood. This continuation of blood rituals points to the persistence of the Babylonian mystery religion under different names.
In Mithraic initiation, initiates stood in a pit beneath a sacrificed bull so its blood would cover them, which was believed to grant purification, spiritual rebirth, and divine favor. After the ritual, they were considered “born again” into the Mithraic mysteries. In Catholicism, Ignatius of Loyola, founder of the Jesuits, composed the Anima Christi prayer, which states: "Soul of Christ, sanctify me. Body of Christ, save me. Blood of Christ, inebriate me." The obsession with Christ’s blood in Catholicism mirrors pagan blood rites. Eucharistic theology claims that the wine literally becomes Christ’s blood, which is then consumed in a ritualistic manner, just like ancient blood sacrifices.
Ignatius of Loyola’s spiritual exercises resemble occultic meditations, much like Mithraic initiations. The Jesuits swore loyalty to the pope in a manner reminiscent of Mithraic initiates swearing allegiance to their high priests. The Jesuits infiltrated and controlled governments, much like the Mithraic cult dominated the Roman military.
The Old Testament forbade drinking blood or using it in rituals (Leviticus 17:11-14). Yet, pagan blood rituals have been repackaged into Catholic theology, disguised as Christian tradition but rooted in Babylonian mystery religion. This connection between Mithraism, the Jesuits, and the blood rituals of Catholicism cannot be ignored.
The Phrygian cap worn by initiates of the Mithraic mystery religion bears a striking resemblance to the papal tiara, further reinforcing the idea that Roman Catholicism absorbed elements of Mithraic and Babylonian mystery religions. The Phrygian cap was a conical, forward-bent hat worn by Mithraic initiates and was associated with esoteric knowledge, initiation, and secret rites. It was a symbol of enlightenment and liberation, much like how Mithras was seen as the bringer of divine light, Sol Invictus, the Unconquered Sun. This cap was later adopted by revolutionary movements, such as in the French Revolution, as a symbol of liberation and hidden knowledge—just as occult initiates view "illumination" as the key to freedom.
The Papal Tiara, also known as the triregnum, was a triple-tiered crown used by popes for centuries. While it may look different in structure, its symbolism is eerily similar to the Phrygian cap of Mithraic initiates. The Mithraic cap signified divine authority over initiates, while the Papal Tiara symbolizes the pope’s claimed authority over all Christians and even secular rulers. Just as Mithraic high priests held dominion over the initiates of their cult, the pope claims absolute spiritual authority over the entire church.
The pope claims to be the Vicar of Christ, wielding the "keys of the kingdom" (Matthew 16:19). However, Mithraism also had a "keeper of the keys" in its hierarchy—one who held esoteric knowledge and secret authority over initiates. The continuation of this "mystery priesthood" into Catholicism suggests that Rome never truly abandoned the Mystery Religion but merely disguised it under Christian terminology.
The similarities between the Phrygian cap of Mithraic initiates and the papal tiara are too strong to ignore. The mystery priesthood of Mithras, with its secret initiations, blood rituals, and claim to divine authority, did not disappear—it simply merged into Roman Catholicism under a different name. The evidence strongly suggests that the Catholic Church is not worshipping Christ but is continuing the ancient worship of Mithras under a Christian façade.
The similarities between the practices of the early Christian church and certain aspects of pagan traditions are too significant to dismiss, which helps explain the transition of the day of rest from the Sabbath (Saturday) to Sunday. This shift aligns with the veneration of the sun, a key feature in ancient pagan religions, which held Sunday as a sacred day dedicated to the worship of the sun god, Mithra or rather Satan.
Despite this change, the Bible does not provide any clear instruction or justification for abolishing the Sabbath as the sacred day to honour the Creator. In fact, the Sabbath was not just a day of rest but a covenant between the true God and humanity, one that carried deep spiritual significance.
The transformation of the day of rest raises questions, especially when we consider that Jesus Himself adhered to the Sabbath, and the apostles continued to observe it even after His death. The fact that the early Christian community kept the Sabbath in the same manner as the Jewish tradition, despite the growing influence of the Roman Empire, indicates a strong continuity with the past. This observance of the Sabbath was central to the moral and spiritual identity of God's people. However, over time, under the influence of the Roman authorities and various political pressures, the Church began to drift away from this biblical practice, eventually adopting Sunday as the official day of worship, aligning with the Roman sun cult.
This change prompts further examination, particularly in light of the claims made by the Roman Catholic Church regarding the relics of the apostle Peter. According to Catholic tradition, "Peter's" bones are said to be entombed beneath St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. However, there is another theory that raises intriguing questions about the nature of Peter's connection to Rome. Justin Martyr, an early Christian apologist, alluded to a statue that was erected in honor of another Simon Peter, Simon Magus, a notorious magician and heretic. Simon Magus was known for his attempts to deceive the people of Samaria by claiming he had divine powers. He reportedly used sorcery and demonic forces to create illusions of grandeur, leading many to believe that he was a powerful deity. This account becomes particularly significant when we consider the possibility that this "Peter" in Rome might not be the apostle Peter but rather Simon Magus, whose practices were seen as heretical and influenced by dark forces.
What is even more perplexing is the apostle Peter's own reference to Rome in the New Testament. In his first epistle, Peter makes a brief but significant mention of the city of Rome, yet he refers to it as "Babylon," a symbolic reference to a place of moral and spiritual corruption, often associated with idolatry and rebellion against God. In Revelation, the city of Babylon is described as the source of great deception, where "by thy sorceries were all nations deceived." This connection between Rome and Babylon raises questions about the true nature of the city's influence on the early Christian faith. Was Rome the new seat of spiritual authority, or was it a place where false teachings and corrupt practices took root?
Furthermore, the Bible contains warnings in several prophetic books about the dangers of deviating from the truth and embracing "doctrines of devils." In 1 Timothy 4:1, it is stated that "the Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons." The practice of sorcery, idolatry, and false teachings was already a significant issue in the early church, and many would fall prey to these deceptions, leading them away from the true gospel.
Considering all these factors, one could ask whether the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) represents a continuation of the true Church established by the apostles, or if it is, in fact, a deviation that stems from the influence of figures like Simon Magus. While the RCC claims to be the successor of Peter's Church, it is important to question the nature of this claim, especially given the historical connections between certain practices in the Church and the influence of Roman paganism. Moreover, Simon Magus, whose sorcery and manipulation led him to work under the Roman emperor Nero, provides a striking parallel to the spiritual forces at play in the early Church's encounter with Rome.
The story of Simon Magus and the eventual Romanization of Christianity is a complex narrative, but it serves as a powerful reminder of the spiritual warfare that was waged between the true gospel and the forces of darkness that sought to distort and pervert the teachings of Christ.
Simon Magus, a figure known for his desire for power and control, was deeply envious of the apostles and their ability to perform miracles through the Holy Spirit. His own practices, rooted in black magic and sorcery, were limited in power and could not match the divine authority the apostles wielded. In his desperation, Simon sought to buy the power of the Holy Spirit, offering money to the apostles in exchange for this sacred gift. Simon Magus's desire to control and manipulate divine forces eventually led him to create Gnosticism, a heretical belief system that sought secret knowledge (gnosis) as the key to salvation, rather than faith in the true gospel of Jesus Christ. Gnosticism presented a distorted version of Christianity, one that downplayed the physical reality of Jesus's life, death, and resurrection, and instead emphasized hidden, mystical knowledge accessible only to a select few.
The influence of figures like Simon Magus, who sought to corrupt the truth of the gospel with his desire for power and secret knowledge, continues to echo through history. His creation of Gnosticism and the promotion of mystical practices that focused on hidden truths rather than the plain message of salvation through Jesus Christ laid the foundation for many later heresies and distortions of the faith. The practices in the Catholic Mass, with its focus on relics, transubstantiation, and mystical rituals, raise the question of whether these traditions are a continuation of the same distortion of the gospel that Simon Magus started.
Ultimately, the real gospel of Jesus Christ, as taught by the apostles, emphasizes a personal relationship with Him, faith in His atoning sacrifice, and living according to His teachings. Anything that detracts from this, including the focus on rituals and relics, risks leading believers away from the true message of salvation. The gospel is not about mystical powers, hidden knowledge, or the veneration of saints and their bones; it is about Jesus Christ, His life, death, and resurrection, and the redemption He offers to all who believe in Him.
Revelation 18:4
"And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues."
The battle between true Christianity and Gnosticism has been ongoing for centuries, beginning in the 2nd century AD and continuing to influence Christian thought throughout history. Early Christian teachings were built on the belief that salvation comes through faith in Jesus Christ, who is both fully divine and fully human. The physical world, though fallen, was created by a loving God and would be redeemed in the future. This was the core message of the Gospel: Christ's incarnation, death, and resurrection brought humanity into right relationship with God.
In contrast, Gnosticism proposed a radically different view. It was a religious and philosophical system that emphasized secret, hidden knowledge (gnosis) as the path to salvation. Gnostics believed that the material world was inherently corrupt, created by a lesser, often malevolent deity, and that only those with secret knowledge could escape this flawed reality and return to a higher, spiritual existence. This view clashed directly with the Christian understanding of creation, the incarnation of Christ, and the resurrection of the body.
The Apostle Paul, in his letters, was deeply aware of the danger posed by teachings that threatened the core truths of the Gospel. In Galatians 1:8-9, Paul warns, "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." Paul was not merely addressing the possibility of doctrinal error; he was confronting the very heart of false teachings that sought to distort the Gospel message. Gnosticism,(the doctrine of devils), with its emphasis on secret knowledge and a disdain for the material world, would have been one such "another gospel" that Paul fiercely opposed. For Paul, the salvation of humanity was tied to the historical reality of Christ’s life, death, and resurrection, not to mystical or esoteric knowledge.
As Christianity spread, it inevitably encountered various ideas, including those rooted in Gnostic thought. Gnostics sought to integrate Christian themes with their beliefs, claiming that Christ's message was about attaining hidden, transcendent knowledge that could free the soul from the material world.
Despite the best efforts, elements of Gnostic thought did not disappear entirely. As Christianity became more institutionalized, there were subtle influences of Gnostic-like ideas, especially in Christian mysticism and in certain allegorical interpretations of Scripture eg: the Assumption of Mary, Mary as the Ark of the Covenant, The Perpetual Virginity, Papal Authority, none of which are in scripture.
The influence of hidden knowledge or deeper spiritual enlightenment persisted, though always in tension with the orthodox Christian belief in salvation through faith in Christ alone.
Thus, the battle Paul foresaw in his letters between true Christianity and false teachings like Gnosticism has persisted for centuries. When he called for those preaching "another gospel" to be accursed, he was warning the early Church against the very ideas that would later shape many Gnostic movements. The core of the Christian faith has always been about the incarnation of Christ, the redemption of the body, and the resurrection of the dead, and any teaching that strayed from these truths was considered a serious threat. This battle between true Christianity and Gnosticism continues to remind believers that the purity of the Gospel message is paramount and that anything seeking to replace or distort it—whether in the form of Gnostic thought or any other teaching—must be rejected.
Mithraism or Gnosticism, neither are true Christianity.
留言